A wise man is a presumptuousness man if he does not take into account how he knows what he thinks he knows. In order to discover anything, Nature dictates a selection must first be made. You cannot "work on discovery" unless the laws of Nature allow you to. Therefore, we as effects of Nature are...
This is about a discovery that supersedes previous knowledge, a.k.a., a paradigm shift in how we perceive our existence and how everyone can confirm for themselves that effects, i.e., something that exist physically or non-physically, are not casual of existence. As the findings show, the...
Please review your statement. There is indeed a "default" explanation as revealed by our own existence via the Final Selection Thought Experiment which is based on the Nature of our existence. If you or anyone can indeed violate the two laws that govern our existence in order to confirm opinions...
You are making the same mistake us effectual beings have been making since the cave man days. Thoughts come from a physical brain, not the other way around. So now we are talking about the scale of physical existence which then leads to the mechanics of "how" existence itself is created. I have...
Actually, the two acts of selection are not in the true sense of the word, "physical". The God theory served as the effect of a non-physical being (creator) of the universe in order cause the effect of our existence, i.e., effect causing effect, which is a violation of cause preceding effect...
Which came first, the chicken or the egg? The answer is neither. Both the chicken and the egg are nothing more than states of existence. As unambiguous empirical evidence has shown, existence (states) comes from non-existence (acts of selection). When we ask effectual questions base on effects...
The error with the first cause logic you are referring to is the assumption that the existence of something (effect), whatever it may be, is causal of the existence of something else (effect), i.e., effect causing effect, which is a violation of temporal precedence. Your example has been proven...
"It means we don't give up our love for religion, nationality or culture but broaden our vision and widen it to accept all humanity without discrimination."
This statement appears to be a prime example of burning a candle from both ends.
Which can only mean existence (each) creates existence (it). Therefore, you are stating that existence is self-causal which means you were never born because, according to your logic, you always existed. I wonder how your parents would feel about such logic ... hold on, you do not have parents...
Which came first, thoughts or the brain? The rules that govern the existence of the brain necessarily supersede thoughts of the brain. Understand this and you can understand why there cannot be a God. Click here to find our for yourself.
In order to believe, it is necessary to be ignorant of knowledge. Obtain knowledge and you no longer need to believe. See for yourself: How The NY Giants Super Bowl Commemorative Series Was Used To Confirm Science Is Based On "Alternative Facts" History
Prayer (indirect selection) cannot overrule death (absence of direct selection). See why: How The NY Giants Super Bowl Commemorative Series Was Used To Confirm Science Is Based On "Alternative Facts" History
To date, not a single believer in God or deities (Muslims, Jews, Christians, etc.) have challenged Nature's laws in order to confirm that their existence may indeed be God given. To do so would be to challenge Nature itself, which as findings show, supersede man's deity theories.
You are indeed very astute. There are two mutually exclusive domains (existence from non-existence) involved. The origin domain generates the two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive acts of direct and indirect selection. The Tempt Destiny experiment has shown that acts of selection can...
Thought comes from a physical brain, not the other way around. Therefore what is necessary for physical existence is necessary for the effects (thought) of physical existence.
The fact that you are using selection to conduct your argument reveals the fallacy of your logic and exposes why you fail to put your money (life) where your mouth is. Thanks for the confirmation!