It pains me to see that the only person present who acted appropriately and admirably is the idiot book burner.
The moron protester who took the mans book should be arrested and prosecuted for theft.
It more than easily fits within the parameters of the OP.
It is pertinent to the topic.
Indeed, it is only implied in criticism of Frances move while at the same time ignoring similar legislation elsewhere.
That`s where the implication lies.
It only matters if you`re willing to oppose this subjugation of freedom while hypocritically accept the subjugation of similar freedoms.
Which is what seems to be going on with the existence of this "news" story.
I don`t recall implying such a thing.
In fact I stated that this law AND the laws similar to it in my country are perfectly acceptable to me.
I am not one who believes "Freedom" is something that is always "good".
I believe I`ve made my point quite clear numerous times.
And I ask...
Even though Christ himself repeatedly says they do?
Are you telling me Christians don`t actually read their own scripture or that Christians tend to ignore the words of Christ?
This is no derail.
This is a perfectly acceptable question towards this OP.
France is being criticized for a law regulating personal dress.
All countries have laws regulating personal dress.
Why is France being picked out of the crowd for criticism?
My mistake.
this is due to their property of keeping the face covered while a Hijab doesn`t cover the face.
Understood.
Thank you.
But it doesn`t change or negate the point of my statement.
As are all the activities I mentioned earlier.
So in your mind Porn is no more inherently "Bad" than watching TV?
Just trying to clarify what you`re saying here.
you don`t need a law to keep women clothed in Canada.
It`s too damn cold to go around without clothes.
:)
I agree but that`s not my argument.
My argument is pointing out the hypocrisy of bashing this French legislation while idly accepting similar laws and even laws more confining of...
But that`s exactly what you did.
Your statement above is a direct reply to the OP..
"Why is pornography bad?".
It seems to imply that all who view porn are addicted to it.
You even state(I assume in reply to the OP)...
OP: "Why is pornography bad?"
Tomato: "I think there is more...