When theists want to believe despite the lack of evidence, they tend to create the evidence from observing the mundane aspects of life as though god is some sort of trickster deity who has hidden proof of his existence as a sort of twisted game.
Furthermore, most agnostics are the silliest bunch of people next to many theists.
Oh, we don't know, we don't know.
You can cry that till the cows don't come home, because as far as our knowledge of what does and does not exist is concerned, most agnostics should be expending the same energy...
You're giving us less credit than we deserve, which is a sad non-humanitarian tactic. If we had not had scientists to understand our place in the universe, we would still be illiterate church following opiates.
Well, if you want to go off on an unrelated secular tangent, then I have to state that the imagination can create that which can be proven to realistically exist in our world. Unfortunately, despite your error in attempting to be disingenuous, I understand that god is not even in the same ballpark.
Oh, yes, except the imaginative concept of something means it exists from the imagination. It does not mean it holds any sway in our reality of existence. If the imagination is all that is needed for something to exist realistically, no wonder theists are fundamentally and cognitively lost.
Yet, we don't see people so adamantly standing up for the existence of unicorns when we lack proof of their existence. I know, you're tired of the unicorn analogy, but yet you keep posting these tired apologist arguments that are not even logical.
Excuse me, but those who are earnestly seeking something will usually always find it, usually illogically and via a personal faith. I could absolutely forego with reason and accept any concept on faith if all I cared about was the comfort believing in it provided to my well being. Unfortunately...
I do not think there is anything wrong with being an angry atheist who is sick and tired of the harm done by religion and religious adherents who continue to support a theistic system that has shown it historically and continuously does more harm than good.
Kind of how you've made up your mind that your truth must be realistic.
In the end, the only reality worth acknowledging is that which can be objectively, empirically understood. All else is simply which provides personal comfort and in no way contributes to what we understand as realistic.
Only the single thing I have wanted since I was a kid. To be a published writer, but at this stage in my life I would settle for a single published novel. But maybe I'll only be one of those writers who becomes famous after I've died.
It is more in relation to how we argue against the theistic concept of god and how many theists use god to manipulate politics and inform others how they should live in accordance with the theistic god concept.
First it would take a miraculous removal of cognitive dissonance.
Secondly, all a theist logically has to do is apply the same method of dismissing the existence of a god in which they do not believe to the god in which they do believe.