I think this most accurately points out the problem with this logic. One religion simply cannot be defined by another religion's standards. If it were, it would be a sub-facet of the defining religion, not a lone entity.
Greetings to all.
I am a man influenced by many self-centered philosophical and religious traditions.
I identify primarily as a Dandy Satanist, focused on aesthetically refined autodeism.
I invest a great deal of my energies in the pursuit and perfection of various tangible pleasures, as well...
I am getting that impression. After all, for the follower of the Left-Hand Path, the goal of joining a religious organization should not be for the purpose of expecting such an organization to define his beliefs, but as a tool for his own enrichment. If there is benefit to be had, petty...
I have a question that pertains not to general Setianism, but to involvement in the Temple of Set itself. Would I, as one who views the Prince of Darkness as a psychologically constructed entity within myself, find myself in a position to benefit from involvement with the Temple of Set?