I agree. So if someone has a reasonable doubt that un-directed chance can account for the origin of life's complexity, how is the component of your argument that i quoted In my first reply relevant?
Thanks wandered off. Don't get me wrong, i can handle attack, fair or unfair, but i also feel that attacks often cloud very good issues that are brought up by all camps. And it's a shame, that's all really.
Storm,
I'm not telling anyone to change, the suggestion was for a separate area, and i wanted peoples thoughts. No offence was intended.
The problem with the non debate areas is that i'm suggesting an area for debate.
If the idea is offensive, i apologise. :(
Hi all.
I introduce myself to the forum with a request or suggestion.
In the uk, many people see their government debate issues in parliament and lament. Why? Because policies affecting our future are debated by a rabble of men and women who throw endless accusations at one another and...
So you agree then, that considering the statistical probability of an event is useful if a matter is not known or is in dispute - even if the event has taken place?