Until such a time comes where people are forced to be hooked up to others as some bizarre form of life support, until such a time where it becomes moral to force others to donate blood and organs to save a dying person's life, until then the morally consistent option is pro-choice.
At it...
"Guys" is so common, I have a hard time believing it would bother people. I think referring to general, unknown things (like animals, hypothetical people, and so on) as "he" is more damaging. IMO it leads people to believe that the default of living creatures is male, whereas you must have some...
Whoa. I don't believe every horse is tested individually for bute. They get slaughtered regardless, which is a pretty good reason to be anti-horse consumption imo, because so many horses are administered bute (for those that don't know, it's an anti-inflammatory/pain killer, extremely common)...
Fair enough. :p Though I, again, am not saying science itself = love. I am only suggesting that it can be used as a tool that can and often does bring about joy. Though I guess that that wouldn't be widely disputed in the first place.
I didn't quite mean that when I said "not hindering nor helping", I meant that science itself is a neutral force. People will always be able to choose to use for the advancement or the detriment of others. It is a human choice.
As to your other points, I just don't see a problem with those...
I created an account just to ask you this question. :P
I'm reading into that last line a bit, but I can't help but ask:
Is it not science that allows you a longer lifespan due to advances in medicine?
Is it not science that has picked away at the various diseases and ailments that might...