• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    We selected for them because they already existed as selectable traits. You just need understand and accept reality. PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC EFFECTS OF HYBRIDIZATION IN DARWIN'S FINCHES. - PubMed - NCBI “New additive genetic variance introduced by hybridization is estimated to be two to three...
  2. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    Don’t hide from reality. Don’t try to pretend you don’t understand that Poodles came about be breeding for specific traits. Traits that already existed and were simply bred for to increase those traits. Just like we currently breed for specific traits. Typical evolutionist response, continually...
  3. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    No time? We have produced over 300 variations while by nature alone only 5 or 6 would have been produced. Poodles are so far down the line that had man not interfered, they would never have existed. Yet their possibility would already have existed in the ancestor stock. Which still destroys...
  4. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    Your questions were the logical fail, which you didn’t even realize. The reason we have so many dog breeds is because man interfered. So if man had not interfered, then there would only be just a few breeds over hundreds of thousands of years as natural disasters, famine, etc brought others...
  5. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    Because 5 breeds is all that’s been produced from them. Shall we now discuss fantasy instead of facts???? Yes, I am sure you all prefer what if’s and maybes instead of cold hard facts. Most evolutionists rely on that for their entire belief system.
  6. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    Only because you fail to understand that the genome has gone from more variation possible to less. That’s why you ignore that the original canine could produce 100 breeds but Poodles can only produce 5. But keep trying to misrepresent reality, maybe you’ll convince yourself . Because the...
  7. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    Read the Grants study in finches. You’ll find your answer. “genetic variation from mating was two to three times greater at producing new genetic variation than was mutation.” They found this result because mating affected several loci at once, every mating, unlike once in a blue moon mutation...
  8. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    So you all keep claiming yet can’t seem to produce any facts that actually refute my claims. All you all ever do is make unsupported claims like this one.... Over and over because rhetoric is all you all have, because the facts don’t support you...
  9. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    Only in your own mind does 100 different breeds versus 5 different breeds not equal less variation..... Typical evolutionist, ignoring reality to keep your fantasy alive in your own mind..... Had I seen your question I would have refuted them the first time as I refuted them when I saw their...
  10. Justatruthseeker

    40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

    Sad you can’t even accept reality..... The sequence CATG will match a few hundred thousand locations in the genome...... Why are you trying so hard to ignore reality? Because pseudoscience is all you have? They even told you they looked for any matches within the genome (that you can’t...
  11. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    I supported every one of my claims. Your oodles and oodles of Poodles do not exist except in your own mind. You asked for verification Poodles were less capable of producing variation than wolves. We’re given it. Then like all evolutionists continue to ignore reality for their fantasy...
  12. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    I keep wondering how each new diversity loosing the ability to create more diversity is an increase in information. But then like some you just can’t accept each of those diversities (breeds) is less capable of producing diversity. Why is reality so hard for evolutionists to accept?
  13. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    So since you were too scared to provide the link I had to go search all your posts..... Ahh, but it is you asserting oodles and oodles of never ending Poodles..... Can you back up your assertion????? I on the other hand claim only a limited variation of Poodles. Since you insist on...
  14. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    The only one avoiding is you avoiding pointing out your post where you asked the question or avoiding asking...... I think you are scared....
  15. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    But it emits the radiation in the transition state from excited to neutral or from neutral to excited. Which means the hydrogen is ionized during the transition phase. Don’t try to play stupid... Ionized gasses are electrons or pisitively charged atoms or negatively charged atoms. Who you...
  16. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    Ask, or point out the post and you’ll get your answer.
  17. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    Sorry, but you are wrong as usual. It’s from star forming regions..... Says the guy that can’t understand the difference between neutral and excited..... so your opinion isn’t worth the space you used to type it. I’m not the one that believes in Fairie Dust. That’s you.... trying to project...
  18. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    Wrong..... Like I said, will ignore the reality.... or another claiming to understand but that doesn't understand anything.. Lyman-alpha emitter - Wikipedia "The Lyman-alpha line in most LAEs is thought to be caused by recombination of interstellar hydrogen that is ionized by an ongoing...
  19. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    You apparently are unaware of how Alpha Lyman spectrum is produced. Only someone completely unaware that the spectrum is produced only when those neutral atoms transition to an excited state, would dare use the word neutral when talking about the spectrums observed in the universe. Lyman alpha...
  20. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    Or the math didn’t work out outside the solar system and you added just enough Fairie Dust to make the numbers work out.... Instead of using the physics used in every plasma laboratory that exists as the dominating force in a universe 99.9% plasma. So, to boil it down you apply the wrong...
Top