• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. tas8831

    Darwin's Illusion

    LOL! Wow, talk about misrepresentation. At least you're not citing Spetner's pap... yet...
  2. tas8831

    Darwin's Illusion

    Purposeful misrepresentation of that which you have been programmed to attack is amazing.
  3. tas8831

    Darwin's Illusion

    Good thing how life began is irrelevant to the ToE. But a science superstar like you pretend to be knows that, right?
  4. tas8831

    Darwin's Illusion

    Projection is amazing. And then he did this: And the "MY guys are RIGHT and everyone else is wrong because what they say agrees with my agenda!!!" continues... The cry of the attention-seeker. You know who else has written things like that? Your hero YEC Tomkins. And every YEC?IDC I have ever...
  5. tas8831

    Darwin's Illusion

    It was hilarious when this was replied to with a claim that I took it out of context and did not provide a link...Creationists are really something... Of course, my detractor also cited a group associated with Mae Wan Ho, so....
  6. tas8831

    Darwin's Illusion

    Says the guy that presented YEC Tomkins' folly as valid. Yeah, I know - I provided the link, clown. So why did you make a big deal about 80% identical PROTEINS between human-chimp (which as you cannot handle was lower than a more expansive comparison that I provided) compared to 85% similar...
  7. tas8831

    Darwin's Illusion

    Cop outs and whining are hilarious.
  8. tas8831

    Darwin's Illusion

    You are terrible at this. You conflate issues and cannot answer simple requests for clarification. Before I waste time educating you on things you pretend to understand again, tell us all - HOW different are those 80% of non-identical proteins? Are they 99% similar? 98% 97% 96%? And why...
  9. tas8831

    Information in the Genome

    So I guess the thread-starter is a post-a-paraphrase-of-YEC-propaganda and runner, eh?
  10. tas8831

    Information in the Genome

    Evidence please.
  11. tas8831

    Information in the Genome

    How do you that we do not know things? Still waiting for the citations I asked for from you - or did you just make that up, too?
  12. tas8831

    Information in the Genome

    False witness is cool. For sinners.
  13. tas8831

    Information in the Genome

    Please stop conflating evolution and abiogenesis. I know you lack the requisite scientific background to formulate any meaningful sentences on the topic, but this constant uninformed yammering of yours is tiresome. Perhaps I can constantly demand that Christians explain why Jesus is 50 feet...
  14. tas8831

    Belief in human evolution makes people better persons

    When one has an agenda to push, they surely can (and do)!
  15. tas8831

    Belief in human evolution makes people better persons

    You could have just written "No, I didn't read the paper."
  16. tas8831

    Belief in human evolution makes people better persons

    Not at all surprising - we see this attitude on this very forum and ones like it (not to mention in one particular political party - the one whose members go out of their way to proclaim their great devotion to certain parts of the bible)...
  17. tas8831

    Why Evolution Is Wrong In Biology And What is Right?

    How did this dust become nucleic acids, lipids, amino acids, etc.?
  18. tas8831

    Why is evolution even still a debate?

    And he never did....
  19. tas8831

    Why Evolution Is Wrong In Biology And What is Right?

    So it was 'man's' fault that God had to make carnivores? Wow, OK... Nope. Hosea 13:16.
  20. tas8831

    Where did world come from?

    Imagine formulating an "argument" on a quote that you do not bother to check the authenticity of.
Top