Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well...none. Sorry. I had a friend who was big into them...he'd draw three from a bag each day as a scrying exercise. He made us a board that says "Fairies in the forest, Dragons on the rooftop"
I'd do it in runes, if I had a clue where you got those from...
Well, Will was a stickler for proper pronunciation and use of the runes...almost as much as he was of English...I seem to remember him explaining what you just said...Interesting. Could be the English Futhorc as well, which is what I prefer. Ironically, it's actually one of the harder alphabets to translate into modern English given it uses old sounds no longer in use in English today
That's another thing to note... Unlike modern English's use of the Roman alphabet, runes have traditionally been used phonetically. For example, the word "ice" if spelled the modern English way in Futhorc runes would be "ᛁᚳᛖ" - I C E. Phonetically, it would be spelled "ᚪᛁᛋ" - Ah Ee S
Sorry for the school lesson, I'll stop
Well, Will was a stickler for proper pronunciation and use of the runes...almost as much as he was of English...I seem to remember him explaining what you just said...
I'm not much good at interpreting the runes yet. I'm learning to use them in spellcraft, though I'm not one to practice magic all that often.
I studied them a bit as a teenager, but they are not part of my practice today.I'd like to know what role the runes play in your life or in your practice. ᛋᚴᚨᛚ!
I studied them a bit as a teenager, but they are not part of my practice today.
However, I am a great fan of ancient languages and different writing systems, so thank you for pointing out the spelling issue.
I think it's a bit awkward to just equate a rune with every letter of the English alphabet and then write out modern English in runes. I mean, it looks cool, but it's still modern English. Some people tend to believe that they "translated" into authentic Norse just by using a different shape of letters...
The better option, as you said, would be to use the runes for phonetic spelling, which means we're still using modern English language, but we're transcribing it into another alphabet with some respect to how that alphabet works (instead of just assuming that every foreign alphabet works exactly like yours).
I had a fun discussion with 2nd-grade students recently... I wrote out their names in hieroglyphs, and some of them complained that I was writing them wrong and there were clearly letters missing. Then I told them, I don't care how you write it in your alphabet: I am writing this down in hieroglyphs and I write what I hear. If I can't hear that letter I don't write it down. They were surprisingly okay with that explanation. So if 2nd graders get it, why is this such a baffling concept to half of the pagan Facebook users out there?
But even if you write phonetically, it's still English. Translating the things you want to say into a language that traditionally used runes as a writing system is another step entirely. I mean, that should be obvious, right? But to some people, it apparently isn't.
Sorry about the language rant. I met lots of dumb people on Facebook and I am traumatized by the experience, I think...
On the related topic: do you study runes or do you also study the associated languages?
Thanks soandso for the recommendation. I have a little book to give me a headstart. In divination I mainly lack confidence and often second guess myself.
ᛁ᛫ᚢᛊᛖ᛫ᚦ︍ᛖ᛫ᚱᚢᚾᛖᛊ᛫ᚠᚱᛟᛗ᛫ᛏᛁᛗᛖ᛫ᛏᛟ᛫ᛏᛁᛗᛖ.᛫ᛁᚾᚲ︍ᛚᚢᛞᛁᛜ︍᛫ᛁᚾ᛫ᚹᚱᛁᛏᛁᛜ︍,᛫ᛊᛈᛖᛚᛚ᛫ᚹᛟᚱᚲ,᛫ᚨᚾᛞ᛫ᛞᛁᚠ︍ᛁᚾᚨᛏᛁᛟᚾ.I'd like to know what role the runes play in your life or in your practice. ᛋᚴᚨᛚ!
ᛁ᛫ᚢᛊᛖ᛫ᚦ︍ᛖ᛫ᚱᚢᚾᛖᛊ᛫ᚠᚱᛟᛗ᛫ᛏᛁᛗᛖ᛫ᛏᛟ᛫ᛏᛁᛗᛖ.᛫ᛁᚾᚲ︍ᛚᚢᛞᛁᛜ︍᛫ᛁᚾ᛫ᚹᚱᛁᛏᛁᛜ︍,᛫ᛊᛈᛖᛚᛚ᛫ᚹᛟᚱᚲ,᛫ᚨᚾᛞ᛫ᛞᛁᚠ︍ᛁᚾᚨᛏᛁᛟᚾ.
Good point. You would have to invent extra letters or change the use of some .. at least, that's what happened in history whenever people picked up a foreign alphabet and started using it in their own language.Ehhh... I'm not so sure phonetic use of the runes is the way to go for writing in modern English, though. Elder Futhark doesn't contain runes for certain sounds that modern English utilizes. For instance, there's no rune for the CH sound
Excellent point, one-on-one letter replacement is a fairly easy way to go. Modern English spelling is a hot mess, though... You sure you want to keep going with that counter-intuitive and exception-riddled chaos of pronunciation options when you have a chance to cut that Gordian knot in a new alphabet?One reason modern English speaking people utilize the Elder Futhark runes in a similar way to the way they utilize Roman alphabet is that the Roman alphabet is extremely old and fairly closely related to the Elder Futhark runeset. It's easier to replace Roman characters for the oldest runes since they are very similar
But aren't they phonetically closer to the English language? I would assume that since the Futhorc was ALREADY adapted to an old form of English it would more readily lend itself to express modern English, too? Or are the phonetics that much different today?Younger Futhark and the English Futhorc evolved on their own since those days and have been too far removed from the Roman alphabet to really be used in a similar way. For example, there is no longer a phonetic use in the Futhorc runeset for sounds such as the Eh-Ah sound of ᛠ (Ear)
Good point as well. I guess it's the easiest option available for people who have already learned English spelling anyway and can't invest lots of time into understanding phonetics and re-mapping spelling rules for lots of words...Well... It's a little more complicated than that, imo. Not everyone is THAT interested in runology - especially since the runes are used for long dead languages. They still want to be able to use the runes though, since the runes do have innate value for some pagan folks, so it's become a common practice to utilize them in the same way they may utilize a modern alphabet
To me, this is legitimate.
Perfectly legit. The only thing I'd object to is when people pretend to have "authentic ancient practice" when what they do is clearly a modern invention or a medley of old elements in a modern context.I feel paganism isn't an old relic to be kept in a museum to collect dust and be preserved for all time. It's a living, breathing, and evolving path. If the modern practice gets people to start using the runes, good. If it organically coalesces into a system that most people end up using, that makes it more useful in general
That's cool to know.The runes themselves primarily. I love linguistics so I will follow ancient words, their meanings, and how they evolved over time in relation to the cultural context of the time they were used vs. the runes and their intent. Etymology is fascinating for me. For instance - Fehu, which once meant wealth through the ownership of livestock has evolved over time into the modern word of "fee." What once was a proliferation of wealth has become a cost to it. To spend
True. I teach language sometimes. English and Latin to German speakers, German to Arabic speakers... The beginners will ask you the most difficult questions. "Why is it done this way" and "Why is it spelled this way?" - and then you have to admit that you have no idea, because you just accepted implicitly that "this is how we do it" and never before thought to question it...It's allowed me to create my own runes for personal use that can be used phonetically in modern American English as well. I will say, writing long paragraphs phonetically instead of using standardised spelling gives a different perspective on spoken language and the ways we construct our spoken words vs. the ways we present them via writing
ᚹᚺᚨᛏ᛫ᛗᛖᚦ︍ᛟᛞᛊ᛫ᚠᛟᚱ᛫ᛞᛁᚠ︍ᛁᚾᚨᛏᛁᛟᚾ᛫ᚹᛁᚦ︍᛫ᚦ︍ᛖ᛫ᚱᚢᚾᛖᛊ᛫ᛞᛟ᛫ᚢ︍ᛟᚢ᛫ᚢᛊᛖ,᛫ᛁᚠ᛫ᚢ︍ᛟᚢ᛫ᛞᛟᚾ'ᛏ᛫ᛗᛁᚾᛞᚢ︍᛫ᚨᛊᚲᛁᛜ︍?