1,000,000,000/1 Against Evolution !

[Yerda]

How old are you? DNA was discovered by Watson and Crick and was published in 1953.

Watson and Crick gave us the double helix/complementary base pair model, but they certainly did not discover DNA. Nucleic acids were isolated as early as the mid-19th century, this makes Alexander here very old indeed.

 

[evearael]

Jaiket... oops! Thank you for the correction!

 

[alexander garcia]

Hi, buttons, thanks for your comment but it proves one of my points everyone keeps telling me I have to get more school Becuse I don't believe (2.5x 10(-8) mutations per nucleotide site or 175 mutations per diploid genome per generation) Yes you are right I would have to go to school to be so inductranated to believe this kind of babble. Hi, E, thank you for the info but tell me how long after 53 did anyone get on the boat? Well as far as the American courts it has not been at all reliable till less than 20 years. And my youngest kids has a 15 year old.

 

[Buttons*]

Hi, buttons, thanks for your comment but it proves one of my points everyone keeps telling me I have to get more school Becuse I don't believe (2.5x 10(-8) mutations per nucleotide site or 175 mutations per diploid genome per generation) Yes you are right I would have to go to school to be so inductranated to believe this kind of babble.

Yes, my comment proves you right, no doubt about it. I'm now convinced, and have decided to become Jewish because you managed to look up some big terms.

 

[mr.guy]

...because you managed to look up some big terms.

AND misspell them.

 

[zabugle]

Hi, Z, DNA you bring up a good point just not for you DNA when did these letters come into exsistence?

The question of how DNA originated is an interesting one, but not particularily relevant to evolution. DNA exists. It is the means by which genetic information is passed from parent to offspring. It is where evolution happens. How it came to be doesn't change this fact.

Mutation when did this word come into exsistence?

A very long time after mutations first arose.

Today you say that the evolutionists were wrong, What will they say of you in years to come?

When did I say that? Do you mean to critque the continued growth in the understanding of evolution? No doubt in years to come we will understand it even better. This is a feature of good science.

Oh ya if scripture is true you don't have many years left.

Not something I'm particularly worried about.

 

[alexander garcia]

Hi,Z and others let me ask how does being Jewish or Spanish oor anything of the like have to do with this? Still if it makes you happy. It don't hurt so have at it thanks. As to DNA I can say it is in scripture thousands of years before anyone knew it as DNA. I can show you what you call science that historicly it was writen years ago. For the one that mentioned my spelling i said and admitt I am stupid and my spelling in every langue=ag is bad or I just want to give you something edumacated to say. Sorry I'll poke some fun for a moment. As to the word mutation you will never find it in any book that is lets see if the world is millions of years a few houndred is nothing? Has your word been around that long? I don't think so. Could be mistaken so if so please tell me a dictionary date and al that and I go to NYC to see my dad and I'll go to the libray and look it up if you can give it to me. I'm sorry if I implied you personally say ed that evolutionists are were wrong in the past I will clear it and say I'm sorry I did not mean it personaly. You should be able to tell I just type or try to type. Still many have said, things like the continued growth in the knowledge of evolution and the like evasive answers. Lets bring this down to my level please. In religion science in general will say if you can find one lie. And it still has not been found. But to evolution it is not a lie or mistake even it is always things like growing in knowledge and on and on. Read my new thread Some problems with evolution and common sence, soon to apear.

 

[Buttons*]

As to DNA I can say it is in scripture thousands of years before anyone knew it as DNA. I can show you what you call science that historicly it was writen years ago.

... what?

Lets bring this down to my level please.

Why did you create such a thread if you wanted to stay at an elementary level?

In religion science in general will say if you can find one lie. And it still has not been found. But to evolution it is not a lie or mistake even it is always things like growing in knowledge and on and on. Read my new thread Some problems with evolution and common sence, soon to apear.

well hopefully your new thread will make some sense.... get a friggin spell check!

 

[mr.guy]

Some problems with evolution and common sence

No scientific theory is required to be intuitive to the layman for validation. Sorry, dude.

 

[alexander garcia]

Hi, if you can't get past elementary just admit it. This is why you are all so suppioriour because you can babble but can't speak elementary and why because you have made your own languag to back your point. Along with your own test of time and this and that. as to my speel (spell) check once agian then what would you have to laugh about? And to make it very clear befor anyone takes offence. I use you in referance to science not people. All that science needs to validate it is what it lacks proff. and to give a real meaning to the word proff, it is what you can PROVE not make theories on or make up words to back what I say as some with much more edumacation then I would use as their prove. We are hear so that proves it . I am not making fun now did the writer really mean that? I am serious do you really think that cause we are here this proves some thing other than we are here?

 

[Buttons*]

language*
spell*
Proof*
here* (not "hear" when you're referencing a place)

 

[Buttons*]

Hi, if you can't get past elementary just admit it. This is why you are all so suppioriour because you can babble but can't speak elementary and why because you have made your own languag to back your point. Along with your own test of time and this and that. as to my speel (spell) check once agian then what would you have to laugh about? And to make it very clear befor anyone takes offence. I use you in referance to science not people. All that science needs to validate it is what it lacks proff. and to give a real meaning to the word proff, it is what you can PROVE not make theories on or make up words to back what I say as some with much more edumacation then I would use as their prove. We are hear so that proves it . I am not making fun now did the writer really mean that? I am serious do you really think that cause we are here this proves some thing other than we are here?

I'm just saying that it's helpful to argue a point when you dont have to look at the jumble of words you slapped together and wonder, "what is he saying?"

So you're asking....(I'm going to take a wild guess here) :

What theories does science possess other than the statement "we just exist"?

 

[standing_alone]

Hi, if you can't get past elementary just admit it. This is why you are all so suppioriour because you can babble but can't speak elementary and why because you have made your own languag to back your point. Along with your own test of time and this and that. as to my speel (spell) check once agian then what would you have to laugh about? And to make it very clear befor anyone takes offence. I use you in referance to science not people. All that science needs to validate it is what it lacks proff. and to give a real meaning to the word proff, it is what you can PROVE not make theories on or make up words to back what I say as some with much more edumacation then I would use as their prove

I'm going to try to be the least rude as possible, but the more I read your posts, the more I think that this is just some kind of joke. I mean, "edumacation?" And what's with the "speel (spell)" check bit. That just made no sense to me. Why did you spell it wrong then put the correct spelling in parentheses? Are you for real? Or is this all just some kind of joke?

 

[alexander garcia]

Hi, B, do you notice that with all mystupidity which I call my self no one has called me that directly but I do see the implications. But do you notice that even misspelling words I'mm still simple enoff to were even the educated can read it but why do you keep telling me to go to school and get an edumacation just to speak English. Please if you can if there is so so much prove on your side please enlighten me in a simple way it should be so easy for any person of all your educations. In fact I can even poke better fun at myself but as you I still can't make your point in English

 

[Buttons*]

Hi, B, do you notice that with all mystupidity which I call my self no one has called me that directly but I do see the implications. But do you notice that even misspelling words I'mm still simple enoff to were even the educated can read it but why do you keep telling me to go to school and get an edumacation just to speak English. Please if you can if there is so so much prove on your side please enlighten me in a simple way it should be so easy for any person of all your educations. In fact I can even poke better fun at myself but as you I still can't make your point in English

Honestly I find your point, not you, too stupid to argue with. I dont see a point in wasting my energies to try and help you with this one. If you really want an answer to your questions, I know Halcyon would be MORE than willing to answer you with a PM on the whole subject.

I dont care that you can make fun of yourself.

 

[standing_alone]

educated

edumacation

educations

Okay, now I'm really thinking this is all a joke. You've been inconsistent with your spelling of certain words. I mean, why can you spell "educations" correctly, but then spell "edumacation" instead of "education." I mean, "educations" is just a plural for "education." This has got to be a joke. I mean, I just don't get how any of this can be serious anymore.

 

[Buttons*]

Okay, now I'm really thinking this is all a joke. You've been inconsistent with your spelling of certain words. I mean, why can you spell "educations" correctly, but then spell "edumacation" wrong. I mean, "educations" is just a plural for "education." This has got to be a joke. I mean, I just don't get how any of this can be serious anymore.

this is, yet, another reason why i refuse to answer any of your posts.

 

[mr.guy]

Ok, kids. That's quite enough.

....I still can't make your point in English

May i ask, what language would be more comfortable for you?

 

[alexander garcia]

Hi, I use to tell people thatI was mr. Know it all. Just to see for my studies of man where one falls these are the lists of people, those that believe me,which I truly feel sorry that you do. The ones that think that I believe that, and I really feel sorry for you and then there are those that know i am clearly doing what I am doing for a reason. Now if you read through here you will see how many times I keep saying that I am a losy speller. in fact I am a losy speller in several languages. Now I will try and be as nice as is in me after all I was born in the City, NEW YORK but do you think that at this day and age that there is a computor that does not have spell check? Also do you really think that I can misspell and correct it in( ) and be so mentally ill that I don't even notice that I did it? Still the post is not a joke and still not one simple answer why?

 

[literal visionary]

First of all, the evo theory. In the beginning before the big bang, there was dust, and the dust just started moving around, pretty soon the piece of dust got pissed at itself and just exploded. Boom! billions of years later we apes, are here wondering if we even really exist. Did anyone scratch their arse and stop to think, in their hasty need to disprove the presence of the divine, that maybe the dust had to come from somewhere, this isn't the the frekin dark ages, something doesn't come from nothing.
the pure idiodacy. My God help us. All these years that the all-knowing super intelligent race of apes have had to argue and mull it over and we still don't have anything to pull out but the big bang theory/ evolution. Does anyone know of another such theory about the magical appearance of physical matter in a 3D world so I can have my mentally retarded foster sister disprove it with a five min brainstorm session.

For those who are atheists believing in the whole evolution lot evolution is listed as a type of religion-
"Quote"
"We're here, and evolution is still going strong today sooo, why does it matter what the odds are? With a universe as vast and old as this one lots of crazy things are bound to happen."

Who needs more faith to belive in what? That little quotation right there is faith in a belief. Blind faith. Faith that God can't exist, because we all Know so much about the world around us. God possibly can't exist because were all too smurt for such childish thoughts. Living in a world that depends on exact balance was born out of chaos -fo sho'- The evolution THEORY goes against all scientifically proven LAWS that we know of in the universe MAGICALLY.Tell me since our scientists know so much- is milk bad or good for you, low carb or low calorie, we don't even have a reliable way to test our own intelligence. We don't even know what should constitute intelligence. At least the bible has a written timeline backed up with quite alot of proof, if you choose to look at such examples, even written in our own DNA. Your atheist ideoloagy leaves me quaking because im just a silly person who believes in God and your smarter because you because you made sure you didn't have that many spelling mistakes. Im very stupid because look at logic differantly. Even though we don't even know what intelligence really is, I don't think I could be that dum,IN FACT! I scored a a high 175(not curved to 165) on an adult IQ test-
Yah when I was in second grade at the age of 6-
but then again people who believe in God are just so ignorant and stupid