• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

1 Death & 6 Arrests In Oregon Standoff

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Just breaking news at 10:20 e.t. No details yet other than Bundy was arrested and charged, plus there was gunfire exchanged with authorities..
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I've noticed that our media still isn't referring to a politically motivated and armed group who made threats to kill as a terrorist group. We call animal rights and deep ecologists terrorists over less.
I am surprised that there have been only six arrests given the presence of multiple armed groups that showed up.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Just breaking news at 10:20 e.t. No details yet other than Bundy was arrested and charged, plus there was gunfire exchanged with authorities..
It's about time.

Bundy was definitely not any kind of poster boy heroically standing up to a tyranical oppressive govt.
.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
As of this morning, there are now 8 under arrest with more to come, and the siege is not over, although some others have left the compound.
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
Too much Alex Jones or something. If your main reason for owning a gun is for fear of a tyrannical government, you probably should lose that right based on mental illness.
 

Mycroft

Ministry of Serendipity
I figure the 2nd Amendment worked for the dead guy. If you're dead, then you're pretty safe from, well, everything.
 

Penumbra

Veteran Member
Premium Member
It's amazing that a bunch of armed people are able to take over federal property for weeks without authorities doing anything about it.

People could drive out if they want, friends could come sing for them, they could get food, etc.

Any other type of group of people doing this would have been shut down within the day.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It's amazing that a bunch of armed people are able to take over federal property for weeks without authorities doing anything about it.
People could drive out if they want, friends could come sing for them, they could get food, etc.
Any other type of group of people doing this would have been shut down within the day.
As I understand it, they're trying to handle the situation with minimum carnage.
There's something to be said for making a conflict so boring that it evaporates
peacefully....relatively so.....avoiding another Waco type debacle.
 

Mycroft

Ministry of Serendipity
Too much Alex Jones or something. If your main reason for owning a gun is for fear of a tyrannical government, you probably should lose that right based on mental illness.

It always amuses me how some shmuck with a rifle thinks he can stop an F-15 or an Abrams tank. But hey, someone's gotta keep that gub'ment in line.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I wonder if it were all Muslims who took over the compound whether it would have been handled the same way? :rolleyes:
I don't wonder, I know. The media would never have put the term terrorist inside quotation marks, and they would all be using the word, and they would have stormed the gates, shot to kill, and we'd be reading about seven deaths, likely more, and no arrests.
 

Akivah

Well-Known Member
I wonder if it were all Muslims who took over the compound whether it would have been handled the same way? :rolleyes:

If history is any guide, the Muslims themselves would've handled it differently. First they would have declared the area as part of the Greater Caliphate. Then they would declare sharia as the only valid law. Lastly, they would have attacked all their non-Muslim neighbors.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I don't wonder, I know. The media would never have put the term terrorist inside quotation marks, and they would all be using the word, and they would have stormed the gates, shot to kill, and we'd be reading about seven deaths, likely more, and no arrests.
Unfortunately, I think you might well be correct.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
If history is any guide, the Muslims themselves would've handled it differently. First they would have declared the area as part of the Greater Caliphate. Then they would declare sharia as the only valid law. Lastly, they would have attacked all their non-Muslim neighbors.
I honestly do not disagree with you based on what we've seen, but let me play devil's advocate a wee bit here with this.

What is the difference between a "freedom fighter" willing to die for his/her cause versus a "terrorist" doing much the same? As a friend of mine is fond of saying, "It all depends on whose ox is being gored". We see references to "Muslim terrorists", but how often have you heard references to "Christian terrorists"?

As a case in point, many on the right have gotten on Obama's case for not saying the words "Muslim terrorists" or "Islamic terrorists", and yet what would they say if he ever said "Christian terrorists"?
 

freethinker44

Well-Known Member
FBI just released video of the shooting. That guy wasn't surrendering, he was making his last stand.
I called it too. When I first saw Finicum in an interview I thought, "whatever happens with this, I bet that guy doesn't come out alive."


EDIT: forgot to link to the video
 
Last edited:
Top