Are you starting all these provocative threads as aVery fine people on both sides.
I assume the Trumpettes and Usual Suspects will be along to invoke Jussie Smollett directly.
duel with those others about violent anti-Trumpies?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are you starting all these provocative threads as aVery fine people on both sides.
I assume the Trumpettes and Usual Suspects will be along to invoke Jussie Smollett directly.
This is a classic example of why everyone should wait for more complete information before making assumptions.Yes, including those who jump to conclusions.
For example
Arrest of black man in black church fire stirs debates
No, I've found photographic evidence that The Donald personally torched them.They already have two suspects in custody, both are black.
Next
I think it's more like.... This...Are you starting all these provocative threads as a
duel with those others about violent anti-Trumpies?
They already have two suspects in custody, both are black.
Next
Are you starting all these provocative threads as a
duel with those others about violent anti-Trumpies?
Because the news sources in question have no interest in white churches.I think the better question is why is it being reported in the media as "traditionally black churches" when approximately %56 of the parishioners are white. I have my ideas-it makes more provocative headlines.
Interesting, can't find that information. I noticed you didn't provide a source to back up your claims.They already have two suspects in custody, both are black.
Next
Shall we hold our breath waiting for him to provide his evidence?Interesting, can't find that information. I noticed you didn't provide a source to back up your claims.
Show us evidence the churches in question have < 50% white parishioners first, then you get to jump on the "librul media grrrr" bandwagon.Because the news sources in question have no interest in white churches.
Black folk are higher in the Victim Olympics pecking order.
Imagine the outcry were it a "traditionally black lesbian synagogue", eh.
This isn't about actual membership, but rather media & audience perception.Show us evidence the churches in question have < 50% white parishioners first, then you get to jump on the "librul media grrrr" bandwagon.
How do you know "%56 (sic) of the parishioners are white"?I think the better question is why is it being reported in the media as "traditionally black churches" when approximately %56 of the parishioners are white. I have my ideas-it makes more provocative headlines.
It is about membership if you're claiming they're not actually black churches.This isn't about actual membership, but rather media & audience perception.
They say "traditionally black churches" & other such attributions to race.
Race is what matters to them...chomping at the bit to blame white
supremacists, the boogeyman den jour. White churches don't fit that agenda.
Btw, it's spelled "liberal", not "librul".
But I didn't claim that.It is about membership if you're claiming they're not actually black churches.
I'm used to people in the conservative culture making stuff up. Their media is to blame.Shall we hold our breath waiting for him to provide his evidence?
Probably because of Google's leftist bias algorithms in the search engine.Interesting, can't find that information. I noticed you didn't provide a source to back up your claims.
Has to be "Fox Nation". I'm not a $ubscriber. I bet it's that wrestler guy's theoryProbably because of Google's leftist bias algorithms in the search engine.
Yes yes, it's all a conspiracy. *eye roll*Probably because of Google's leftist bias algorithms in the search engine.
Interesting, can't find that information. I noticed you didn't provide a source to back up your claims.