Good luck with that.Again, pick one lie that we can discuss.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Good luck with that.Again, pick one lie that we can discuss.
Why pick just one?
Is the network a source of sound journalism? Or not? If these claims that are brought forward by Stewart a distortion of the network itself, then shouldn't ALL of the claims be distortions, or at least MOST?
For the record, I get my news (NEWS, not commentary) from C-SPAN. The cable news networks IMO are nothing for me to rely on that are factual at all.
That includes FOX.
Pick one so that we might have a discussion.
I pick all 50. If you want to discuss just one that's your business.
How about choosing the worst, in your opinion, and let's have a discussion.
Do what you want, but I'm not going to artificially limit the discussion to just one lie out of 50.
Can't do it? BTW didn't Stewart mention his retiring to a Zen monastery in his rant? Don't you think that's a lie, or is Jon Stewart simply a comedian that would say anything for a laugh?
7. "There is no good data showing secondhand smoke kills people."
John Stossel, Dec. 4, 2014
Because I like you today...
Is this factual that there is no good data?
Because I like you today...
Is this factual that there is no good data?
That is the key. Jon Stewart is a comedian first and foremost, he has admitted his bias against Republicans, he has admitted things are edited, and he is on a channel called "Comedy Central." Though he may call out Fox News for lies, he himself does not masquerade as a real news anchor giving real and unbiased news.Can't do it? BTW didn't Stewart mention his retiring to a Zen monastery in his rant? Don't you think that's a lie, or is Jon Stewart simply a comedian that would say anything for a laugh?
I find it interesting that no one wants to touch this post. I'm still waiting.Does anybody want to refute the claim made by Stewart that any of these reports made at FOX are not factual?
Are supporters conceding to the claim of falsehoods? Or is Stewart wrong, and supporters are arguing that FOX's reports are, indeed, factual?
Cause they know fox makes stuff up. Or they'll say something like MSDNC lies also. False equivalence entirely! No one come close to fox in the misinformation realm.I find it interesting that no one wants to touch this post. I'm still waiting.
So, where do you get your news from? Can't be the printed news because it says the same thing as the TV news source do. Or do you just remain ignorant?
But you know, this almost goes hand in hand with being a conservative. Conservatism thrives on deception, exaggeration, fabrication, falsification, hyperbole, vilification, prevarication, and guile. Not to make a case for itself, which rarely happens, but a case against its opposition. It's just like creationism, which can't make a case for itself so must resort to attacking evolution. It's a political and social philosophy of the intellectually bankrupt.Cause they know fox makes $hit up. Or they'll say something like MSDNC lies also. False equivalence entirely! No one come close to fox in the misinformation realm.
With RW media, they leave information out. RW media never mentions positive things that democrats do. RW media never mentions negative things that republicans do. So the RW media audience is left in the dark intentionally.But you know, this almost goes hand in hand with being a conservative. Conservatism thrives on deception, exaggeration, fabrication, falsification, hyperbole, vilification, prevarication, and guile. Not to make a case for itself, which rarely happens, but a case against its opposition. It's just like creationism, which can't make a case for itself so must resort to attacking evolution. It's a political and social philosophy of the intellectually bankrupt.