• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

55% of GOP Say Sexual Assault shouldn't bar a SCOTUS nominee

Epic Beard Man

Bearded Philosopher
"Newsweek notes, an Economist/YouGov poll has found that 55% of Republicans hold that even if Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when he was in high school, that would not disqualify him from serving on the Supreme Court.

Note well. They didn’t ask them if they disbelieved the charges and therefore didn’t think he was disqualified.

The question was, if he were actually guilty, should he serve? And a majority of Republicans said he should not be disqualified for this reason. Another 18% said they just didn’t know whether it was disqualifying. Really? Attempted rape shouldn’t keep you off the court?

71% of Democrats said that sexual assault is disqualifying. Are they more capable of ethical reasoning, or are they just being partisan and hoping the Democrats can keep their 5-4 majority on the court, which Kavanaugh would permanently throw out?"

55% of GOP Say Sexual Assault Not Disqualifying for SCOTUS; What Is *Wrong* With Them?

According Wikipedia (Everyone's go-to-website):

"Republicans believe individuals should take responsibility for their own circumstances."

The irony
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Is there a police record to backup the claim of assault against Kavanaugh?

Though I am not an American or Republican I would have to say it depends on the circumstances. It someone patted a butt when it wasn't desired or expected is still sexual assault and a far cry from attempted rape so it really would depend on the nature of the allegations and how much credibility can be placed in those allegations.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
"Newsweek notes, an Economist/YouGov poll has found that 55% of Republicans hold that even if Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when he was in high school, that would not disqualify him from serving on the Supreme Court.

Note well. They didn’t ask them if they disbelieved the charges and therefore didn’t think he was disqualified.

The question was, if he were actually guilty, should he serve? And a majority of Republicans said he should not be disqualified for this reason. Another 18% said they just didn’t know whether it was disqualifying. Really? Attempted rape shouldn’t keep you off the court?

71% of Democrats said that sexual assault is disqualifying. Are they more capable of ethical reasoning, or are they just being partisan and hoping the Democrats can keep their 5-4 majority on the court, which Kavanaugh would permanently throw out?"

55% of GOP Say Sexual Assault Not Disqualifying for SCOTUS; What Is *Wrong* With Them?

According Wikipedia (Everyone's go-to-website):

"Republicans believe individuals should take responsibility for their own circumstances."

The irony
Ethics has never been much of factor here. Its victory by hook or crook and then whitewashing of history by the victor.
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
"Newsweek notes, an Economist/YouGov poll has found that 55% of Republicans hold that even if Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when he was in high school, that would not disqualify him from serving on the Supreme Court.

Note well. They didn’t ask them if they disbelieved the charges and therefore didn’t think he was disqualified.

The question was, if he were actually guilty, should he serve? And a majority of Republicans said he should not be disqualified for this reason. Another 18% said they just didn’t know whether it was disqualifying. Really? Attempted rape shouldn’t keep you off the court?

71% of Democrats said that sexual assault is disqualifying. Are they more capable of ethical reasoning, or are they just being partisan and hoping the Democrats can keep their 5-4 majority on the court, which Kavanaugh would permanently throw out?"

55% of GOP Say Sexual Assault Not Disqualifying for SCOTUS; What Is *Wrong* With Them?

According Wikipedia (Everyone's go-to-website):

"Republicans believe individuals should take responsibility for their own circumstances."

The irony


The new face of the GOP: Lock up your daughters, because under the GOP?

There will be NO JUSTICE for women.
 

Cacotopia

Let's go full Trottle
Crimes towards society are debts that must be paid, but they should not bar anyone from contributing further towards society. Otherwise you are creating a fundamentally flawed system that encourages criminal behavior due debts being paid but never forgiven.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Crimes towards society are debts that must be paid, but they should not bar anyone from contributing further towards society. Otherwise you are creating a fundamentally flawed system that encourages criminal behavior due debts being paid but never forgiven.
Crime isn't a debt, it's a mental defect. "Repaying the debt" is unlikely to fix it.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
The question is: does a character flaw interfere with one's ability to do a particular job? Would you choose an experienced but boorish surgeon or auto mechanic over a virtuous but inexperienced one?
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
It is amazing to me that a party that is entrenched in Christianity cannot bring itself to believe what JC would have been preaching.
 

HonestJoe

Well-Known Member
"Newsweek notes, an Economist/YouGov poll has found that 55% of Republicans hold that even if Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when he was in high school, that would not disqualify him from serving on the Supreme Court.
Open question because I don’t know the answer; If he had been convicted of that kind of offence, given he was a minor at the time, could the record have been accessed by the committee considering his position now?
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Politicians don't let ethics get in the way of their agendas. They only pretend to care when it's their political opponents who are under scrutiny.
 

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
55% of GOP Say Sexual Assault Not Disqualifying for SCOTUS; What Is *Wrong* With Them?

According Wikipedia (Everyone's go-to-website):

"Republicans believe individuals should take responsibility for their own circumstances."

The irony

The new face of the GOP: Lock up your daughters, because under the GOP?

There will be NO JUSTICE for women.

It looks like the GOP will decriminalize Sex Trafficking.

Sky is falling? No matter how you roll it, it's still fear and panic any way you want to smoke it. You can't appeal to anyone's logic, if they have any remaining, by stoking the spooky ghosts of victim mentality and ethical puritanism. Personally, I find it troubling that the women whom have been legitimately abused will find themselves gaining less traction moving forward. This play is not working out as planned it has simply publicized how damaging false allegations are. The solution is simpler...

The conservative attitudes will just shift to breeding out liberals. They won't let their sons come anywhere near liberal women for fear of being falsely accused. It's far easier than putting up with the drama. If the only future you have in relation to the liberal is living in fear of their sexual allegation trump card -- that is no future. No one willingly will work their whole lives to have it all squandered away. So, enjoy your ramblings, but realize you're the only one that pays the cost by eating yourselves. People will switch away from liberalism if it doesn't change, because that mentality fails the written laws of evolution.

As far as sex-traffic, no President in the last 30 years has apprehended as many suspects as Trump's administration. This is simply a non-rational, unfounded, and an erroneous argument.

The perpetual demonization of whomever walks right of the left is backfiring and will galvanize anyone with a shred of common sense away from crazy town. It's already begun.
 
Last edited:

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
"Newsweek notes, an Economist/YouGov poll has found that 55% of Republicans hold that even if Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when he was in high school, that would not disqualify him from serving on the Supreme Court.

Note well. They didn’t ask them if they disbelieved the charges and therefore didn’t think he was disqualified.

The question was, if he were actually guilty, should he serve? And a majority of Republicans said he should not be disqualified for this reason. Another 18% said they just didn’t know whether it was disqualifying. Really? Attempted rape shouldn’t keep you off the court?

71% of Democrats said that sexual assault is disqualifying. Are they more capable of ethical reasoning, or are they just being partisan and hoping the Democrats can keep their 5-4 majority on the court, which Kavanaugh would permanently throw out?"

55% of GOP Say Sexual Assault Not Disqualifying for SCOTUS; What Is *Wrong* With Them?

According Wikipedia (Everyone's go-to-website):

"Republicans believe individuals should take responsibility for their own circumstances."

The irony
It's flabbergasting taking these things all the way back to high school. This deals with hormone induced teenagers with poor judgement here, not adults.

The million zillion dollar question anyways is, Is there actually evidence, like a record on a police blotter or disciplinary measure taken, or is it a decades old memory of something that I would think would be vauge at best without a written record or documentation of some sort.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
The question is: does a character flaw interfere with one's ability to do a particular job? Would you choose an experienced but boorish surgeon or auto mechanic over a virtuous but inexperienced one?

When it comes to those who make decisions regarding our rights and liberties, virtue is pretty damn important.
 
Top