• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

55% of GOP Say Sexual Assault shouldn't bar a SCOTUS nominee

Epic Beard Man

Bearded Philosopher
Open question because I don’t know the answer; If he had been convicted of that kind of offence, given he was a minor at the time, could the record have been accessed by the committee considering his position now?

Depends if he was charged, and if he was charged it would depend if it was expunged from his records.
 

Epic Beard Man

Bearded Philosopher
Crimes towards society are debts that must be paid, but they should not bar anyone from contributing further towards society. Otherwise you are creating a fundamentally flawed system that encourages criminal behavior due debts being paid but never forgiven.

But he never paid his debt even as a minor (assuming he is guilty). But crimes are not necessarily against everyone (unless the actual crime itself effects a mass group of people) but often it is against one or a few. To get away from a crime even as a minor could potentially lead to a bigger issue.
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
How is crime a mental defect? Haven't you ever take a pen that wasn't yours? Or gotten into a fight? Crime is the result of many factors but hardly a mental defect.

We like to demonize criminals in my country, it seems. On top of that, we demonize mental health and then conflate criminal activity with mental illness. This in spite of the fact that those suffering from mental health problems are more likely to be victims of crimes than perpetrators. But folks have all sorts of ideas running around in their heads that aren't supported by the facts. Usually it's benign, but in these case it's harmful.

At any rate, for something like the supreme court, I expect a record that is beyond reproach and a particular sort of character. The candidate already failed to demonstrate said character during this process, whether or not they are also guilty of perhaps the most heinous crime of all.
 

Cacotopia

Let's go full Trottle
then
But he never paid his debt even as a minor (assuming he is guilty). But crimes are not necessarily against everyone (unless the actual crime itself effects a mass group of people) but often it is against one or a few. To get away from a crime even as a minor could potentially lead to a bigger issue.
he needs to pay for that "debt" in order to move on within society.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Depends if he was charged, and if he was charged it would depend if it was expunged from his records.

That is the public record. Law enforcement still has private records including juvenile. The FBI would have accessed those records on the his first investigation decades ago. Alarm bells would have been going off just for him to become a judge let alone SCOTUS. Depending on the charges made by police, not Ford's opinion, Kav may not be employable by the federal government at all. The Fed website for employment has a list of convictions which make one ineligible for employment by the Fed. State and local will have their own standards.

(Granting the argument)

I do not remember the list in details. Just knowledge there is one.
 
Last edited:

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
When it comes to those who make decisions regarding our rights and liberties, virtue is pretty damn important.
Depends on what virtues we're talking about, I'd say. One can be passionate about rights and liberties and still be a lecherous horn-dog.
How is crime a mental defect? Haven't you ever take a pen that wasn't yours? Or gotten into a fight? Crime is the result of many factors but hardly a mental defect.
Isn't all behavior psychologically mediated? Wouldn't harmful or anti-social behavior be products of neurological or psychological factors?

What are these "other factors" that can bypass the brain yet affect behavior?
then
he needs to pay for that "debt" in order to move on within society.
But payment of a debt is a contract -- with both parties exchanging something of value to each.
Imprisonment isn't an exchange, and nothing was contracted.
The individual or social harm caused by the crime isn't corrected by the "payment," nor is the defect that enabled the crime in the first place.

Our justice system isn't designed for either psychotherapy or 'correction'. It's designed for orderly, controlled retribution to prevent vigilantism and vendetta.
 

Cacotopia

Let's go full Trottle
Depends on what virtues we're talking about, I'd say. One can be passionate about rights and liberties and still be a lecherous horn-dog.
Isn't all behavior psychologically mediated? Wouldn't harmful or anti-social behavior be products of neurological or psychological factors?

What are these "other factors" that can bypass the brain yet affect behavior?
But payment of a debt is a contract -- with both parties exchanging something of value to each.
Imprisonment isn't an exchange, and nothing was contracted.
The individual or social harm caused by the crime isn't corrected by the "payment," nor is the defect that enabled the crime in the first place.

Our justice system isn't designed for either psychotherapy or 'correction'. It's designed for orderly, controlled retribution to prevent vigilantism and vendetta.
how would you then redesign the prison system to make it where you rehabilitate people to reenter society?

The American model doesn't work. at all.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
how would you then redesign the prison system to make it where you rehabilitate people to reenter society?

The American model doesn't work. at all.
So stop being so insular and look for other, more effective models:
 
Top