You obviously do not understand the difference between “individuals within these groups” and “the entire group”. Your reading comprehension is really not my problem.
Yes. There are individuals within blm and antifa who have committed equal or greater crimes than anything I saw from the idiots at the capitol during 1-6. This is obvious. And despite what the propaganda fueling your emotions compels you to believe, 1-6 was not a “coup attempt”, it was a bunch of pissed of people lashing out because their favorite politician lost the election. There was never any chance of them accomplishing anything like a “coup”, just making fools of themselves. The right has no issue denouncing those people’s actions yet there are countless cognitively dissonant hypocrites on the left will never denounce antifa or blm.
It seems that there's a lot of wrangling and consternation over which side denounces whom and whether it's a strong enough denunciation to satisfy those who want them denounced.
As if any of it will make any difference when each individual case is decided in court.
It probably won't change very many people's minds either. Those who were pro-Trump prior to 1/6 will likely continue to be, and those who were against Trump will likely continue to be.
Likewise, those who support the causes of racial justice, equality, and civil rights will likely continue to do so, regardless of how anyone feels about antifa or BLM, which I've seen mixed opinions about. "Antifa" and "BLM" are just monikers that they use, but they're not the entire cause, in and of itself.
Besides, they're not singular organizations with a single leader, so denouncing them is more a matter of denouncing certain individuals who commit violent or criminal acts, without lumping them in with those who are peaceful and law-abiding.