8 Hezbi Terrorists killed in Qalamoun

[Servant_of_the_One1]

Qalamoun is where Hezbi Terrorists are dying like flies.


8 militiamen of Hezbollah killed in al- Qalamoun in the last 48 hours, and shells land on al- Yarmouk Camp | Syrian Observatory For Human Rights

 

[Kirran]

Death and violence is always lamentable.

I hope for peace in these lands.

 

[Kalibhakta]

Oh look, more Sunnis murdering Shia.

Keep showing how much you love the family of the prophet, Servant_of_the_One1

 

[Khudayar]

Hizbullah are terrorists and ISIS-NUSRA and AL-CIADA are freedom fighters, right? Typical McCain thought.

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

Oh look, more Sunnis murdering Shia.

Keep showing how much you love the family of the prophet, Servant_of_the_One1

What the hell you know about family of prophet PBUH? LOL


Your agreement with shia rawafidh shows that shias are far removed from islam. Why else would a polytheist who worships rats and idols agree with shia unless the shia also worships idols and creatures beside Allah? Hindus and shias are closer to each other than Shias and Muslims.

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

Hizbullah are terrorists and ISIS-NUSRA and AL-CIADA are freedom fighters, right? Typical McCain thought.

Yes , Hezbu Satan and Isis are big terrorists.
As for Nusrah, they rejected terrorism few days ago.

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

Oh look, more monotheists murdering each other over minor doctrinal differences. What a shock... ¬__¬

I have a solution: pull all non-Muslims out of the Middle East, build a gigantic wall around it, impose a complete trade and travel embargo, and cut off all forms of communication to the ME with the outside world. Then we sit back and let them senselessly slaughter each other. That's a win-win because:

1) The West will finally stop interfering in the region (which means all kinds of interference because it is hypocrisy for Muslims to demand we stop interfering while they accept our kuffar monies for economic or aid reasons) at last.
2) Muslims will finally have nobody else to blame but themselves for the fact the region is in such an appalling state. As well as this, the West will finally stop hearing about how everything is our fault.
3) Western lives will finally stop being wasted on wars started through deceit which have evolved into pointless attempts at helping barbarians civilise themselves.
4) We can start concentrating international aid on areas of the world that actually appreciate our help.
5) We in Europe can finally stop trading our souls for oil through the import of toxic, barbarian ideologies like Wahhabism & Salafism.

I know; there's no way we could achieve this in reality. It'd be nice if we could though.

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

Oh look, more monotheists murdering each other over minor doctrinal differences. What a shock... ¬__¬

I have a solution: pull all non-Muslims out of the Middle East, build a gigantic wall around it, impose a complete trade and travel embargo, and cut off all forms of communication to the ME with the outside world. Then we sit back and let them senselessly slaughter each other. That's a win-win because:

1) The West will finally stop interfering in the region (which means all kinds of interference because it is hypocrisy for Muslims to demand we stop interfering while they accept our kuffar monies for economic or aid reasons) at last.
2) Muslims will finally have nobody else to blame but themselves for the fact the region is in such an appalling state. As well as this, the West will finally stop hearing about how everything is our fault.
3) Western lives will finally stop being wasted on wars started through deceit which have evolved into pointless attempts at helping barbarians civilise themselves.
4) We can start concentrating international aid on areas of the world that actually appreciate our help.
5) We in Europe can finally stop trading our souls for oil through the import of toxic, barbarian ideologies like Wahhabism & Salafism.

I know; there's no way we could achieve this in reality. It'd be nice if we could though.

I like the part u said pull out occupiers from muslim countries.

 

[Smart_Guy]

I'm afraid both sides are guilty for killing each other

Darn them! They made fools out of Muslims on front of other religions followers.

And each side tells lies about the others and insist of them.

This is stupid. Can't they solve their differences with... um, video games or something?

 

[Khudayar]

Mr. "Servant"! Wow, what a good morality and ethics you have?

The morality of the above "Mushriks" (polytheists) as you refer to is more like the morality of the Prophet and Ahlulbayt, whereas I see none of those holy ethics in you.

Thus, the blessed terms such as sunni (i.e. follower of the traditions of the Holy Prophet Muhammad), shia (i.e. supporter of the Prophet's blessed progeny), sufi (i.e. woolen cloakeds; those who don't care about worldy materials) are just labels that one can not achive by merely calling himself one. It may be that someone who identifies himself as something else can be a true sunni-shia-sufi muslim.

As the Holy Prophet of Islam says; "Whoever is lagging behind in deeds will never catch up by label."

And it is sad that you think Muslims and non-Muslims should differ in everything. Probably you should stop eating-drinking-talking and even breathing then, because they are the same things the non-muslims do also.

Silly indeed.

Imam Ali, in his enhchanting letter to Maalik al-Ashtar, says that: "There are two kinds of people: those who have the same religion as you have; they are brothers to you, and those who have religions other than that of yours, they are human beings like you."

This is the truth. And human beings (whether Muslim or Christian or Hindu, etc.) have many things in common such as intelligence to differentiate between truth and falsehood, good and bad. There is nothing suprising about that.

I'm afraid both sides are guilty for killing each other

Damn them! They made fools out of Muslims on front of other religions followers.

And each side tells lies about the others and insist of them.

This is stupid. Can't they solve their differences with... um, video games or something?

Why damn them? I understand your condemnation of the takfiris (i.e. those who accuse believers of apostasy, polytheism, etc and then kill them) such as the takfiri ISIS, NUSRA and others. But why condemn the blessed Hizbullah for defending the Lebanese and Syrian people? Weird indeed.

 

[Wirey]

Why damn them? I understand your condemnation of the takfiris (i.e. those who accuse believers of apostasy, polytheism, etc and then kill them) such as the takfiri ISIS, NUSRA and others. But why condemn the blessed Hizbullah for defending the Lebanese and Syrian people? Weird indeed.

Fruballed! Made me laugh!

 

[Smart_Guy]

Mr. "Servant"! Wow, what a good morality and ethics you have?

The morality of the above "Mushriks" (polytheists) as you refer to is more like the morality of the Prophet and Ahlulbayt, whereas I see none of those holy ethics in you.

Thus, the blessed terms such as "sunni" (i.e. follower of the traditions of the Holy Prophet Muhammad), "shia" (i.e. supporter of the Prophet's blessed progeny), sufi (i.e. woolen cloakeds; those who don't care about worldy materials) are just labels that one can not achive by merely calling himself one. It may be that someone who identifies himself as something else can be a true sunni-shia-sufi muslim.

As the Holy Prophet of Islam says; "Whoever is lagging behind in deeds will never catch up by label."

And it is sad that you think Muslims and non-Muslims should differ in everything. Probably you should stop eating-drinking-talking and even breathing then, because they are the same things the non-muslims do also.

Silly indeed.

Imam Ali, in his enhchanting letter to Maalik al-Ashtar, says that: "There are two kinds of people: those who have the same religion as you have; they are brothers to you, and those who have religions other than that of yours, they are human beings like you."

This is the truth. And human beings (whether Muslim or Christian or Hindu, etc.) have many things in common such as intelligence to differentiate between truth and falsehood, good and bad. There is nothing suprising about that.

Why damn them? I understand your condemnation of the takfiris (i.e. those who accuse believers of apostasy, polytheism, etc and then kill them) such as the takfiri ISIS, NUSRA and others. But why condemn the blessed Hizbullah for defending the Lebanese and Syrian people? Weird indeed.

Um, you're not getting my point, and you're taking sides. I believe the smart move is to not never sides in what we do not understand.

All of them have political agenda between the lines there and we as bystanders know nothing of what's going in their heads. It is way much complicated than we can fathom.

Just in case you haven't noticed, I didn't mean to damn them from the mercy of God or just curse them negatively, I'm upset at what they are doing to each other. I don't take sides.

I edited the word to "darn" instead. Sorry about that.

Is Hizbullah defending AL-Asad's regime? I heard that some of AL-Asad's troops forced some innocent civilians to say that no God but Al-Asad. I don't believe it of course, so I ask you maybe you know; is this true?

 

[Khudayar]

Well maybe you don't understand what is going on there but I do. So, I am taking sides. The side of the people (no matter what religion or sect) against takfiri cannibals.

Hizbullah is an ally to the Syrian government and people and he is against the takfiri wahhabis infiltrating Syria and Lebanon from all over the world. Which should be the case for all sane people.

As for your question on the Syrian government and army, you can listen to this interview:

 

[Smart_Guy]

I tend to believe you brother, but your posts imply that you are taking a sectarian side since you are condemning sects and generalizing goodness on others.

Also, I don't think you understand really, just as I don't, the politics those sects mix with their beliefs. Don't believe the media. Enough making fools out of ourselves on front the the rest of the world. Btw, do you know Arabic well, both formal and informal?

You believe what Bashar says himself? You shouldn't. Take my advice and don't believe politics. Let's not allow ourselves to take a side just because they follow the same belief we do. A govt isn't only its leader. Even if you believe Bashar, don't believe the overall thing.

You probably are talking about ISIS by saying Wahhabi. Even the Sa udi govt. , which said to be Wahhabi (like 30% of the Saudis), warns us Saudis against having any relationship with ISIS. They even warns to take away the Saudi nationality from us. I'm Saudi living here and I know this. All people I personally know are against ISIS.

Believe me, both me and you know nothing useful in these propaganda.

 

[Khudayar]

I am not taking a sectarian side. I support all Muslims (sunni, shia, sufi) and non-muslims of the region against the cannibals which are the evil product of the wahhabi ideology.

As for the Saudi regime warning its citizens from not going to Syria under the command of ISIS is not because they are against ISIS. It is because they need those monsters for rainy days. The Saudi dictatorship is using and is gonna use them

1- inside the country
a- as police force (crashing the angry poor-oppressed folk who protest against the family rule)
b- as suicide bombers (especially on shia and sufi mosques)
c- as executioners (see for instance Saudi regime recruiting more public beheaders: Saudi Arabia To Recruit 8 New Executioners As Beheading Rate Soars - Politics , Saudi Arabia hiring more head choppers , etc.)
d- ... etc.

2- outside the country as invasionist soldiers (against Yemen, Bahrain, etc.).

So, ISIS and Boko Haram is the Saudi wahhabism in foreign lands trying to get into power whereas Saudi kingdom-dynasty and its public executioners, invasionist army officials etc. are them at home. I see no difference between them. Can you see any?

 

[leibowde84]

U are mushrik. What the hell you know about family of prophet PBUH? LOL


Your agreement with shia rawafidh shows that shias are far removed from islam. Why else would a polytheist who worships rats and idols agree with shia unless the shia also worships idols and creatures beside Allah? Hindus and shias are closer to each other than Shias and Muslims.

Was Muhammad so hateful of those with differing beliefs?

 

[Smart_Guy]

I am not taking a sectarian side. I support all Muslims (sunni, shia, sufi) and non-muslims of the region against the cannibals which are the evil product of the wahhabi ideology.

As for the Saudi regime warning its citizens from not going to Syria under the command of ISIS is not because they are against ISIS. It is because they need those monsters for rainy days. The Saudi dictatorship is using and is gonna use them

1- inside the country
a- as police force (crashing the angry poor-oppressed folk who protest against the family rule)
b- as suicide bombers (especially on shia and sufi mosques)
c- as executioners (see for instance Saudi regime recruiting more public beheaders: Saudi Arabia To Recruit 8 New Executioners As Beheading Rate Soars - Politics , Saudi Arabia hiring more head choppers , etc.)
d- ... etc.

2- outside the country as invasionist soldiers (against Yemen, Bahrain, etc.).

So, ISIS and Boko Haram is the Saudi wahhabism in foreign lands trying to get into power whereas Saudi kingdom-dynasty and its public executioners, invasionist army officials etc. are them at home. I see no difference between them. Can you see any?

I understand.

Thank you for sharing your views and opinions, brother.

I just hope that one day Muslims stop discrimination against each other, and of course against non Muslims too.

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

Was Muhammad so hateful of those with differing beliefs?

This got nothing to do with Muhammad pbuh.

Its just annoying that someone who worships idols talks about family of prophet Muhammad pbuh as if they were polytheists or approves of grave worship(somethinh that shias are quilty of today)

 

[leibowde84]

This got nothing to do with Muhammad pbuh.

Its just annoying that someone who worships idols talks about family of prophet Muhammad pbuh as if they were polytheists or approves of grave worship(somethinh that shias are quilty of today)

What idols do they worship? You cited where Hindus took their side on an issue, but you couldn't think that means that they share religious beliefs, could you?

 

[leibowde84]

I understand.

Thank you for sharing your views and opinions, brother.

I just hope that one day Muslims stop discrimination against each other, and of course against non Muslims too.

I know you are the best one to ask this, so I'm going for it. What's with all the animosity between Muslims who agree on everything but a few, seemingly unimportant, ideas? I thought the whole idea of Islam was to unite everyone in a common faith in God. How on earth could nit-picking on meaningless differences further that goal?