• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

$85,210

Thief

Rogue Theologian
No major war for 75 yrs, nukes have been a good investment.

As for changes-
Everyone knows how to fix the schools,
manage defense and balance the budget
just like every creationist is a expert on
geology and Bible interpretin'.
lumping too many people together

but then again......how a politician views the economy.....
is biblical
 

ecco

Veteran Member
Obama added 8.59 trillion
Trump added 6.7 Trillion
Part of Obama's "added debt" was to pull the Country out of the massive recession caused by Republican failure to provide oversight.

Trump inherited a booming economy and added two trillion to the debt with his tax cut for the wealthy and the Corporations. A move that Democrats will need to reverse.
 

Suave

Simulated character
Not at all... Biden's math is new math! And your statement was how Republicans spend while you keep a blind eye on Obama et al.
The national debt was less than GDP during the Obama presidency, whereas, the national debt was greater than GDP when the orangutan like great ape was president.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I know. I was there. And I remember people being scared and frightened of what never came.
Because it could'a.
And it nearly did a few times.
So? China and America are the two pigs running their farms, looking really no discernibly different from the other animals running their farms.
America depends on China. China depends on America. Sam or Xi can't do much to each other without shooting themselves in the foot over it.
War isn't always waged based upon what makes sense.
Emotion & misunderstanding also rule.

The only thing it's been useful for is the proliferation and spread of nuclear weapons, materials, and waste. It's was useful for fueling the unknowns of a potential rogue nuclear terrorist attack. It dumped barrels of nuclear waste in the ocean. And it brought a whole new pandoras box of nightmares when MUF started becoming a thing.
The ability to retaliate with nuclear weapons makes
it unattractive to try to conquer those who have'm.
This is useful. Iran knows it. Think we'd attack
them again if we feared nukes on Israel or home?
 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Because it could'a.
And it nearly did a few times.
It could have. And all that was done was beat the drum we need more and bigger bombs. Not anything to actually solve the issue that had us wanting more bombs, but just to keep building them as if that would win the Cold War.
Gorillas beating their chest at each other is all MAD is. And now because we had to have those bigger bombs and an excessively large arsenal of them, now we have Pakistan with the bomb and who is surrounded by extremists.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It could have. And all that was done was beat the drum we need more and bigger bombs. Not anything to actually solve the issue that had us wanting more bombs, but just to keep building them as if that would win the Cold War.
Gorillas beating their chest at each other is all MAD is. And now because we had to have those bigger bombs and an excessively large arsenal of them, now we have Pakistan with the bomb and who is surrounded by extremists.
That wasn't all that was done.
Reagan warmed to the Russians, & negotiated
a reasonable peace with Gorbachev.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Not at all... Biden's math is new math! And your statement was how Republicans spend while you keep a blind eye on Obama et al.
Let me do the simple math for you.

Obama 8.59/8 = 1.07 trillion per year
Trump 6.7/4 = 1.675 trillion per year

1.675 is bigger than 1.07.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Which probably should've happened closer to the begging then a few decades later.
And the greatest tragedy is that we could've achieved so much more had our nations cooperated.
Cooperation is often defeated by internal political concerns.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Let me do the simple math for you.

Obama 8.59/8 = 1.07 trillion per year
Trump 6.7/4 = 1.675 trillion per year

1.675 is bigger than 1.07.
Ok... let's do simple math.

Biden... 1.9 Trillion in 3 months... and more than that is coming down the pike...
Trump... .4785 per 3 months.

1.9 Trillion is bigger than .4785
 

Suave

Simulated character
Ok... let's do simple math.

Biden... 1.9 Trillion in 3 months... and more than that is coming down the pike...
Trump... .4785 per 3 months.

1.9 Trillion is bigger than .4785
Trump...3.7 trillion per year 2020 Biden/Harris ...? per year 2021. I bet that the federal budget deficit will be less for this year than last year's federal budget deficit of 3.7 trillion dollars.
 
Last edited:

We Never Know

No Slack
Ok... let's do simple math.

Biden... 1.9 Trillion in 3 months... and more than that is coming down the pike...
Trump... .4785 per 3 months.

1.9 Trillion is bigger than .4785

Lets do simple math....

When Trump took office in January 2017, the national debt stood at $19.9 trillion. In October 2020, the national debt reached a new high of over $27 trillion.
Keep in mind Trump said he would eliminate it in 8 years.

Edit...

Instead of eliminating it in 8 years, he raised it $8 trillion in 4 years.
 
Last edited:

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
I suppose our federal government can always print more money in case borrowing from lenders will not suffice.
:) It has been one of the ways they have done it. Just print more money. End of this process is simply hyper-inflation.

Where did they get the 1.9 Trillion Covid dollars?... just printed it.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Part of Obama's "added debt" was to pull the Country out of the massive recession caused by Republican failure to provide oversight.

Trump inherited a booming economy and added two trillion to the debt with his tax cut for the wealthy and the Corporations. A move that Democrats will need to reverse.
Yes... we always have a reason why it is OK when it is one's personal party.

My position.... it is wrong when done by the Republicans and it is still wrong when it is done by the Democrats.

While politicians just "add debt"... people like me learn to live with the money we make and place "a little" in our savings account and investment accounts. (We started by putting $3 a week in the savings account, the clothing account, the dental account, the entertainment account) for a family of 5.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Lets do simple math....

When Trump took office in January 2017, the national debt stood at $19.9 trillion. In October 2020, the national debt reached a new high of over $27 trillion.
Keep in mind Trump said he would eliminate it in 8 years.

Edit...

Instead of eliminating it in 8 years, he raised it $8 trillion in 4 years.
Yes... Obama made the same type of prediction as he ran on "the Republicans are putting too much debt"
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member

Suave

Simulated character
:) It has been one of the ways they have done it. Just print more money. End of this process is simply hyper-inflation.

Where did they get the 1.9 Trillion Covid dollars?... just printed it.
There has not been any significant U. S. Inflation over the last 40 years. Near record low interest rates indicate there are plenty of debt lender dollars available to fund the current level of public debt.
 
Last edited:
Top