You keep mis-stating things, using "haven't been able" instead of "refused to".I didn't claim victory or say anything to suggest any such claim of victory. I am only sticking to the topic of the evidence concerning the destruction of the WTC buildings in noting that (1) you haven't been able to provide any calculations showing that the formulation of nanothermite found in the 9/11 dust is incapable of cutting steel; (2) you haven't been able to account for the presence of the nanothermite found in the 9/11 dust except as an incendiary/explosive involved in the destruction of the buildings; and (3) you haven't been able to account for the evidence of temperatures in the WTC buildings that were much higher than those produced by office-materials fires.
Not taking that bait.