9/11 Was NOT an Inside Job

[Kemosloby]

They don't need to if you're taking a several hundred tonne projectile and throwing at a skyscraper at at least 100 mph. Aside from the thermal energy you've got a considerable kinetic energy in there too which will raise the temperature a great deal. You're also forgetting that the fires would be burning in confined spaces which would cause further temperature increases.

I will have to disagree with that. Fires in confined spaces would be oxygen starved. They melt steel in blast furnaces. If anything projectiles moving at 100 mph would cool because of the wind. I don't think i've ever heard of buildings melting when they collapse.

 

[AllenWalker]

Ah --- I follow. A Klein shock opening up possibilities, an excuse to invade some other country. (How'd that work out).
But how do you account for the Arab nationals manning the planes? What was in it for them?

America and Saudi have good connection. America could easily have offered something such as money, think about it, the possibility of it to occur with such success is low.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

If anything projectiles moving at 100 mph would cool because of the wind.

Things such as friction even apply to the air (it's why space shuttles ignite when reentering Earth's atmosphere). It's also how diesel engines--engines with no spark plugs--function.

 

[Kemosloby]

Things such as friction even apply to the air (it's why space shuttles ignite when reentering Earth's atmosphere). It's also how diesel engines--engines with no spark plugs--function.

Good point, even inside the block of an engine steel does not melt. And the reentry speed of the space shuttle is 17,500 mph. So 9/11 was an inside job.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Good point, even inside the block of an engine steel does not melt. And the reentry speed of the space shuttle is 17,500 mph. So 9/11 was an inside job.

None of those prove 9/11 was an inside job. As for engines, parts start braking, warping, and failing long before the engine could melt, and they also have cooling systems. The space shuttle proves that objects moving at high speeds would not "cool because of the winds."

 

[Kemosloby]

None of those prove 9/11 was an inside job. As for engines, parts start braking, warping, and failing long before the engine could melt, and they also have cooling systems. The space shuttle proves that objects moving at high speeds would not "cool because of the winds."

17,500 mph..and how fast do you believe the wtc debris was moving? Correct, no engine has melted because of friction, supersonic jets do not melt. You just so freaking duped, I can't bear it. Who did you vote for?

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Correct, no engine has melted because of friction, supersonic jets do not melt.

They don't melt first and mostly because of cooling systems, and second because other parts will degrade, shut down, and fail and cause engine failure long before the engine can melt. You'll crack the block before you melt it, which renders the engine dead.

You just so freaking duped,

You say this to me, even though you think diesel engines not melting proves 9/11 is an inside job?

 

[Kemosloby]

None of those prove 9/11 was an inside job. As for engines, parts start braking, warping, and failing long before the engine could melt, and they also have cooling systems. The space shuttle proves that objects moving at high speeds would not "cool because of the winds."

Object cool because of the winds up

They don't melt first and mostly because of cooling systems, and second because other parts will degrade, shut down, and fail and cause engine failure long before the engine can melt. You'll crack the block before you melt it, which renders the engine dead.

You say this to me, even though you think diesel engines not melting proves 9/11 is an inside job?

Supersonic speeds are required before an object traveling through the atmosphere begins to heat up rather than cool down. 768 mph or 1,125 feet per second. the wtc was 1,300 feet tall. so it would have had to come down in 1 second to even begin to gain heat.

 

[Valjean]

America and Saudi have good connection. America could easily have offered something such as money, think about it, the possibility of it to occur with such success is low.

The planes weren't manned by Saudi Government agents, they were manned by Saudi renegades.