SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Well ... yeah.Oh definitely. But that's to be expected from people who get their understanding of science from Chick tracts, Kent Hovind, and Ken Ham.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well ... yeah.Oh definitely. But that's to be expected from people who get their understanding of science from Chick tracts, Kent Hovind, and Ken Ham.
It's not rocket science and I don't believe you don't know all about Lucy.
lucy fossil hoax - Google Search
fossil hoax - Google Search
Ah, yes, Piltdown Man.
Endlessly fascinated by the examples.
On the subject of science -- what I find is that evangelicals and other religious objectors to evolution distrust science ONLY when it concerns evolution. They cannot answer why they think that everybody who actually does the hard of work of years of study and decades of research all manage to get it wrong, while a few who don't do any work at all magically arrive at the only correct answer. (Just another absurd bit of hubris that must be "taken on faith," one presumes.)
And that is a fundamentally foolish notion, given that they all accept the work of science in mathematics, in chemistry, in electronics (you use TV and a computer, no doubt). Very, very few of the religious doubters of evolution would manage to build a television, space ship or computer -- or program it -- without having studied, and when they do study and research, they continue to learn more and more.
This dichotomy is the very clearest evidence possible that yours is a purely religious, and quite uneducated stance. The only reason for it is that science that builds TVs and space ships and computers don't conflict with your creation fable, while evolution does.
I'm not sure what you mean by your reference to Lucy. However, I'm constantly reminded that nay-sayers simply do not understand the paucity of fossil evidence, while the answer is so simple -- that fossilization itself takes place only very, very rarely under very, very special circumstances.
Have you ever met a man incapable of telling a lie?
Meet God. He is most holy and He loves you. Your life isn't a random occurrence. You are here for a reason. You were created with purpose.
The research conducted in those sites is genuine. If it isn't then post your refutation and stop just saying there is no truth in it because they are "religious" sites. That is fallacious and you know it.
What part of: the evolutionary researchers concluded that Lucy should no longer be considered man’s direct ancestor are you not getting?
At first it was claimed that Lucy was man's direct ancestor. Or did you not know this? I guess you didn't.
It matters because one flaw flaws everything. That's why nothing science comes up with is true. Don't ya know nothing?Why does that matter?
It matters because one flaw flaws everything. That's why nothing science comes up with is true. Don't ya know nothing?
.