ellenjanuary
Well-Known Member
So, I had to stop running my neck so that I could take the bus to Glendale to get my meds...
Man, lemme tell ya about the people on the bus: "It's only supposed to be one person, one seat... people put their backpacks on the seat next to them like it's OK... man, no one cares about anybody but their selves... " Better yet, how about I don't mention the "people on the bus?" The "bus to Glendale" only exists so that the fool can get his meds. The fool only takes meds to be a "more coherent fool." Thus, the question that remains, is;; is the fool coherent?
I say, god does not exist, for existence limits god. But, of course god exists; we're sitting here arguing about it. When I say, god is; there is no reward for "getting it," there is no punishment for "not getting it." All there is, is a fool trying to share understanding. It is not for this fool to speak of "the way," but I do speak of "a way." A tao that we can all understand. Or not...
How does this fool find a measure of contentment with the title of "fool?" Cause I'm out of my fool head over Gwyneth Paltrow. That is scientific fact.
So, do I have a point? That's up to you to decide. I don't advocate the worship of Gwyneth Paltrow, I'm here to share understanding. And I have understood a lot more after a year of coming to the religiousforums.
Thank you.
Man, lemme tell ya about the people on the bus: "It's only supposed to be one person, one seat... people put their backpacks on the seat next to them like it's OK... man, no one cares about anybody but their selves... " Better yet, how about I don't mention the "people on the bus?" The "bus to Glendale" only exists so that the fool can get his meds. The fool only takes meds to be a "more coherent fool." Thus, the question that remains, is;; is the fool coherent?
I say, god does not exist, for existence limits god. But, of course god exists; we're sitting here arguing about it. When I say, god is; there is no reward for "getting it," there is no punishment for "not getting it." All there is, is a fool trying to share understanding. It is not for this fool to speak of "the way," but I do speak of "a way." A tao that we can all understand. Or not...
How does this fool find a measure of contentment with the title of "fool?" Cause I'm out of my fool head over Gwyneth Paltrow. That is scientific fact.
So, do I have a point? That's up to you to decide. I don't advocate the worship of Gwyneth Paltrow, I'm here to share understanding. And I have understood a lot more after a year of coming to the religiousforums.
Thank you.
Last edited:
