Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
For me, it's not so much a matter of 'let' as it is visceral reaction that my mind seems to take. While I'm working on trying to control it, I'm glad it doesn't prevent me from trying to help. I'm glad to have insight into the way another mind works, though!Neo-Logic said:I've learned to feel sorry for those suffering without coming to tears. I think if I or all of us let ourselves be taken over by sorrow because of other's suffering, we would be in a state of constant grief and despair.
michael, you just wanted to be the first one with 100%, admit it!michel said:I am almost disappointed to realize I voted with the majority.
I heard an American, from New Orleans, interviewed today saying that this has been forecast four years ago........Terrywoodenpic said:Does any one know if there was a contingency plan in place to cover the aftermath of storm damage to the levees.
It was known it would happen one day and should have been covered by normal risk assessment processes.
Before blame is given, we need to know if the planners or emergency teams were to blame.
Terry
____________________________
Amen! Truly I say to you: Gather in my name. I am with you.
http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=7149Bush's single-minded focus on the "war against terrorism" has compounded a natural disaster and turned it into the greatest calamity in American history. The U.S. has lost its largest and most strategic port and thousands of lives, and 80 percent of one of America's most historic cities is under water.
If terrorists had achieved this result, it would rank as the greatest terrorist success in history.
Our consular officials can't even get in to locate and remove our citizens (because of some bureaucratic crap)...it's been left up to Australian press to find Australian citizens amongst the survivors and get them out. Now you've got the families of the missing mooching about the place seeming to have no problems getting into NO to try and find their son's and daughters. I've been at a loss the whole time as to how the reporters were running all over the place reporting on what was going on and the victims didn't seem to be able to get any help from official sources.painted wolf said:here's a question... if the reporters could get in and out and get food and water... why the $#!! couldn't the people they were reporting on not get any help?
Where did the reporters get thier food and water and why couldn't any of it reach the starving /dehydrated people they interviewed also get some?:areyoucra
Am I missing something here?:banghead3
wa:do
You know, yes, maybe there could have been more done by the government for instance, having built better levees to withstand this kind of disaster that they knew was coming for years. But you can not say that the government did nothing. My squadron HM-15 and the USS Bataan was given less than 12 hours notice to get all our **** together, say good bye to our families (many of whom had JUST gotten off another deployment two days prior, I myself had just gotten engaged) and be ready to fly out at 5:00 am before the storm ever even made landfall. The storm was still crossing over when we had pulled out and were nearing the coast. I am tired of not hearing enough appreciation for what the people who are ACTUALLY OUT there have done. The corpman that is the rack next to mine woke me up today with horror stories of what she had seen in the airport turned hospital. This girl had not slept, showered or probably even eaten in two days because she was too busy helping lost children, and people who were dying all the while being surrounded by feces and blood. If you think YOU could do more...... be my guest. I am not saying that the government has done as much as it could...no, I do believe that more could be done but we can not discount the sacrifice of the people working so hard. Again, maybe WE ALL needed to do more... not just complain about it and if we dislike the system so much that prevented adequate aide well then hopefully that will be reflected in the next presidential campaign.Jensa said:Aid should have started going there the second the hurricane passed. There is no reason to allow anarchy to go on for days in what is supposed to be a first world country.
If that's the case. so is everything else on the newsHas that been confirmed?
It'll be all hear-say as far as anyone is concerned
Where in the world did that come from?! If I or anybody in this thread made a statement that looked even remotely like that or indicated that, could you please do me the pleasure of letting me know ( especially since you are conveniently responding to my quote)Just because a few people are taking advantage of this situation, the whole of NOLA- all the innocents, deserve to just drown?
ah, well let me see here, does that mean that if somebody gets raped or robed in the town that is neighboring to the town I live in, we can blame the authorities since there is not a police station or officer in the town and the nearest authorities are almost ten miles away?! you've got to be kidding me.If there was better management the looting and the crimes would have been reduced dramaticly.
congradulations!!! That's the statement that got me to move my schedule around just so I could respond tonight.I'm sick of the "DOWN WITH THE PEOPLE WHO ARE- ... already down!" I keep seeing- especially from those safe with their houses and lives and loved ones.
I agreeIn addition, an investigation into the failure of local authorities to inforce a mandatory evacuation and peace officers who deserted their sworn duties and in some cases, joined in on the looting.
Since I have already gotten off subject here, I may as well continue. This the absolutely most hilarious statment made in this thread!!! Do you sincerely believe there is such a thing?! Do I really need to explain the inflence of sponsers, the public and yes even the (gasp) government?! Or should I get into the philosphical contradictoons of that statement and how facts don't speak for themselves but always need an interpretation and due to factors like world views, philosophies, religion, etc. it is pretty much impossible for almost any aspect of the media (maybe with the exception of weather forcasting) to be agreed on by everybody as having no biased at all?This isn't from some left/right/any-wing site, it was on NBC's Meet the Press.