rational experiences
Veteran Member
Humans observing claim design is intelligent by concepts of how everything supports everything else. So have a think upon their owned thoughts.
Think self intelligent and preach self is intelligent, One of many multi preaching.
Thinking says to itself as everything is so precisely balanced it had to have come from the same place, before change, where it was perfectly balanced. Intelligent design the quote.
Spirit and eternal was that answer with the concept unconditional....owned no descriptive analogy imposed just for human science. To invent to force change to the highest coldest aspect quantified to be God O the stone planet its natural presence fused. To get energy for all scientific human inventions.
Seeing energy he quotes was created and sits in its holding place, space. Where energy got created he quotes. So energy is just one of many multi conditions involved in intelligent design involving balances and support.
We know we use energy to remain alive as a living presence. So as we need energy we impose that it is living via our owned conscious aspects.
The argument, where did and how did it come into form, and what place/cause did it come from.
A spiritual status was given, the eternal, where the uncondition of a loving being existed, owning all origins, perfect balances. For it had always existed, always will exist and only a portion of that body was changed into an imbalance, that did not allow for control......as it became reactive. Reactive conditions therefore are not balanced...and are not perfect and are not in design. For they own removal conditions.
Design, I will copy quotes science. Yet the concept is only a thought, an observation and a want. Forming a belief that the reactive stage can be copied...and not anything else. So an invention is then designed to string lots of information into an artificial placement, a machine, to then take natural form in balances, change it and then react it. Design by science conditions.
Science therefore proves to self it did not design design.....their status copying. Why it is argued over as a topic of discussion.
Anyone using basic common sense would quote, what do you personally know if none of the bodies existing for you to study did not exist first or originally? For comparing information is not design, it is comparing?
Think self intelligent and preach self is intelligent, One of many multi preaching.
Thinking says to itself as everything is so precisely balanced it had to have come from the same place, before change, where it was perfectly balanced. Intelligent design the quote.
Spirit and eternal was that answer with the concept unconditional....owned no descriptive analogy imposed just for human science. To invent to force change to the highest coldest aspect quantified to be God O the stone planet its natural presence fused. To get energy for all scientific human inventions.
Seeing energy he quotes was created and sits in its holding place, space. Where energy got created he quotes. So energy is just one of many multi conditions involved in intelligent design involving balances and support.
We know we use energy to remain alive as a living presence. So as we need energy we impose that it is living via our owned conscious aspects.
The argument, where did and how did it come into form, and what place/cause did it come from.
A spiritual status was given, the eternal, where the uncondition of a loving being existed, owning all origins, perfect balances. For it had always existed, always will exist and only a portion of that body was changed into an imbalance, that did not allow for control......as it became reactive. Reactive conditions therefore are not balanced...and are not perfect and are not in design. For they own removal conditions.
Design, I will copy quotes science. Yet the concept is only a thought, an observation and a want. Forming a belief that the reactive stage can be copied...and not anything else. So an invention is then designed to string lots of information into an artificial placement, a machine, to then take natural form in balances, change it and then react it. Design by science conditions.
Science therefore proves to self it did not design design.....their status copying. Why it is argued over as a topic of discussion.
Anyone using basic common sense would quote, what do you personally know if none of the bodies existing for you to study did not exist first or originally? For comparing information is not design, it is comparing?