Skwim
Veteran Member
How recent does a sexual assault have to be to be valid?The gal's story is an old one though.
.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How recent does a sexual assault have to be to be valid?The gal's story is an old one though.
In her role of quieting his victims, she enabled his continuing to assault new victims.But you are blaming Hillary for the actions of Bill. That is not fair. Hillary has never been accused of rape or sexual assault.
You make it sound like she held women down will Bill had his way.
I was correcting the claim that she only recently surfaced,How recent does a sexual assault have to be to be valid?
.
Many of us find our limited choices difficult.So now it's possible that Trump committed sexual assault, on top of every bigoted, hateful, and irrational thing he has said. And his main competitor voted in favor of the Iraq War and is a warmonger. These are the types of people who have the most serious chance at winning the presidency of the U.S.?
The Land of Opportunity indeed, baby.
It is still a pretty weird thing for someone to come out with against someone she was "on good terms, friendly terms." with. If this is how she treats her friends, I hate to see how she treats her enemies.I was correcting the claim that she only recently surfaced,
not objecting to her timeliness.
Geeze.....don't people read all the posts here!?
Many of us find our limited choices difficult.
I don't know how truthful her account is.It is still a pretty weird thing for someone to come out with against someone she "good, friendly" relationship with. If this is how she treats her friends, I hate to see how she treats her enemies.
It is still a pretty weird thing for someone to come out with against someone she was "on good terms, friendly terms." with. If this is how she treats her friends, I hate to see how she treats her enemies.
Unlike so many others, I'd have to know all the nitty gritty details of the story, DS. If the story had no real traction 20 years ago, it has less today.If he did sexually assault her, does it matter whether he was her "friend" or not as far as her speaking out against him goes?
Unlike so many others, I'd have to know all the nitty gritty details of the story, DS. If the story had no real traction 20 years ago, it has less today.
If you think that this is equivalent to actual rape, then you have to see that Donald has been accused of the same thing in more detail.In her role of quieting his victims, she enabled his continuing to assault new victims.
Example.....
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...nton-rape-accuser-hillary-tried-to-silence-me
she says Mr. Trump tied her to a bed and forcibly raped her, in a “savage sexual attack,” while she pleaded with him to stop. She says Mr. Trump violently struck her in the face. She says that afterward, if she ever revealed what he had done, Mr. Trump threatened that she and her family would be “physically harmed if not killed.”
How does noting that it was an old story correct any claim that "she only recently surfaced"? These are two very different issues.I was correcting the claim that she only recently surfaced,
not objecting to her timeliness.
Geeze.....don't people read all the posts here!?
You're trying to argue that Trump committed worse sexual assaults than did Clinton.If you think that this is equivalent to actual rape, then you have to see that Donald has been accused of the same thing in more detail.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html
Perhaps I should be clearer.How does noting that it was an old story correct any claim that "she only recently surfaced"? These are two very different issues.
.
Use first names to make this clear.You're trying to argue that Trump committed worse sexual assaults than did Clinton.
Hey, if you don't believe a sexual assault needs to have a time stamp to be valid, fine.Perhaps I should be clearer.
This woman's claim is not recent, despite a couple statements otherwise.
Does this do the job?
I think we finally have a common understanding.Hey, if you don't believe a sexual assault needs to have a time stamp to be valid, fine.
.
And yet, if the case is laughed out of court, will you still think that he is guilty?But I think we'd agree that it would be unreasonable to work from the assumption that Trump is certainly innocent in this case, right? If this is the third time he has been accused of such an act and given his hateful, psychopathic attitude, I I won't be surprised if this is indeed something he did.
And yet, if the case is laughed out of court, will you still think that he is guilty?