-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Abiogenesis or the Lord?
- Thread starter Jimmy
- Start date
We might. But does demonstration of abiogenesis rule out God?
Jimmy
King Phenomenon
Jimmy
King Phenomenon
The demonstration will never come. Just something man will never do. Or woman.
How do you know that abiogenesis cannot be done?
One hundred years ago, a heart couldn't be removed from a dead man and reused in a live one.
Jimmy
King Phenomenon
I just know. Life will never be made in a lab
Nothing I can say to that except I don't know.
I don't know whether abiogenesis will be demonstrated or not.
I don't know that if it is demonstrated in a lab that it will be the abiogenesis that took place for life on Earth.
I don't know that God didn't use abiogenesis as a means of creation.
What I do not know is evidence only of my ignorance.
Jimmy
King Phenomenon
In the beginning God made RNA don’t ya know? Haha
Lords, or any arbitrary Lord, is irelevant since there is no evidnce of them existing. Abiogennesis is a plausible explanation that is founded on facts, data, and a hypothesis that can work.
That RNA reference is missing from all of my versions of Bibles. Has it been added by a mortal as an act of fraud?
Care to present the evidence?
So you're clarvoyant? Or just making a bad guess because you fear the consequences of such a finding?
Of Abiogenesis? It's widely available for anyone to study up on. The Urey-Miller experiment was the first successful test of this phenomenon.
It already has, several times, Google it
Jimmy
King Phenomenon
No it hasnt
Tell Google that
Jimmy
King Phenomenon
I’m all set
Exaltist Ethan
Bridging the Gap Between Believers and Skeptics
The Omniverse developed conditions for this Universe to exist and allowing abiogenesis and evolution to occur. The Omniverse has done this so we could ultimately create our own synverses, our own created places. As a pan-en-en-en-en-en-deist I subscribe to the notion that ultimate nature ultimately passively created these conditions so that we could create our own conditions. Simple as that.
Go for it.
Synthetic life, alien life (not from another planet but with dna components that are not natural), self replicating life, evolving life. It seems, once the conditions are correct life is fairly easy to create. What is difficult is proving thats what happened 3.7 billion years ago. Abiogenesis is the best answer given what is known but cannot be proven
What I believe, what I know and what I can demonstrate are three different things.
Jimmy
King Phenomenon
Life was never created from non living components in a lab