That doesn’t keep you from claiming / believing that the Earth formed through natural means of accretion. Lol.
Give us a break.
My theory for the formation of the earth is that the earth came from our sun, as our sun reformed from a first generation star into a second generation star, from the materials of own first generation beginning.
Relatively new data now shows that galaxies and stars formed in the early universe, much earlier than the standard model predicted. What you learn in school is foundational thinking, not the state of the art. The state of the art is still a work in progress.
The 1st galaxies may have formed much earlier than we thought, James Webb Space Telescope reveals
This much earlier time frame of galaxy formation, is when the universe was much smaller, denser and had far more gravitational density. Rapid formation of galaxies was much easier with this higher gravity density. Since the modern universe expands relatively to the galaxies, it is reasonable to assume there was sort of an much earlier than expected condensation into galaxy droplets and then even star droplets; phase separation, that subsequently expanded and still perpetuates even until today. Extreme pressure physics has more phase tricks up its sleeve than the expanding gas and slow random formation models used for foundational thinking.
My belief is our galaxy and sun were part of the first condensation, with the sun a first generation star. The first sun, reached its peak and expanded, and then reformed, along with the planets and moons of our solar system. Our localized solar rebirth, explains the large empty gap between our sun and solar system and the next star; cleared out some room to grow.
To make this possible, requires Solar 1 not go full supernova. This also requires an improved stellar synthesis model, that will allow the first sun or Solar 1, to able to form much higher atoms, even before it expanded and reformed, allowing rocky planets, like the earth. The goal is less bang, but better starting material ability, with more weight, to keep things closer.
The basic theory, to make this all possible, is connected to density differences. If we place a piece of iron in a glass of water, the iron will sink, since iron is much denser and heavier than water. On the other hand, if I hammer the iron into the shape of the hull of a little boat, I can now make the denser iron float on water; battle ship. In terms of atomic synthesis, the electron clouds add volume to the atoms, thereby lowering its atomic density relative to its nuclear density. The more electrons we add, the larger the hull of the ship, the more cargo; nuclear mass, we can haul, and still float on water.
In this stellar model, material density is not based on atomic density, like we have on earth, but ionized atomic density, with loss of electrons to form highly ionized atoms, creating an effect like the hull of the iron ship. What this means is smaller atoms like hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen and oxygen, etc, will be fully ionized, which is like the block of iron that will sink. While higher ionized atoms like iron, that still retain some inner elections, will have a hull; plasma density hull, and they will float on the nuclear density hydrogen, oxygen, etc.
This model of stellar interior, has a core of fully ionized smaller atoms, surrounded by all the larger, partially ionized; some inner electrons, heavier atoms that will float above the core; are less dense. This heavy atom flotilla, "armada of ships, will act like a containment shell for the fusion reactor core and its smaller and denser atom fuel. This design can passively regulate the reaction rates of the fusion core, so there is never any runaway fusion. This allows stars to last for billions of years.
If the fusion core was to get too hot, this would ionize the shell of the heavy atoms making the shell denser and heavier, thereby restricting diffusion of the denser fuel atoms to the core. This cools the core; sun spots. As the core cools, electrons will add back to the shell and make the shell expand and become less dense, allowing fuel to migrate to the core. This can cause a surge of local fusion; solar flair.
The fuel surge and then the local fusion surge, will explode with fully ionized core atoms hitting the shell, like a hammer hitting a gong; fusion hammer. This is the mother of all particle accelerators and colliders, with the shell the target. The entrained smaller fully ionized atoms helps to build higher atoms and will further thicken the shell; the shell is an atomic synthesis factory. It will segregate by plasma density which ends up as the smaller atoms closer to core for more efficient atom building.
Periodically, the shell will get very thick with higher atoms, and the hydrogen fuel diffusion, from the surface to the core, will becomes more and more rated limited. This can lead to extended cooling of the fusion core, and an exaggerated expansion of the shell. This can lead to a major fuel surge and then a blow out, that cleans out the pipes; blow out parts of the shell. When extreme it can create the material for planets and even a binary star sister. The sun then stabilizes as density differences rebuild the remaining shell.
Okay that's what you claim. Now what's your supporting evidence?
