If a being, from everlasting to everlasting, that has no beginning or end, and is alone in this unique situation, creates something, imagines something, we can analyze the potential place and value of that "something" created. When we do analyze it, we find the follow results at minimum.
1)Being a perfect God, implies there can be no other as equal. Otherwise, God is not uniquely, exclusively perfect. The justification for this statement is in that anything God creates is at best a division of God, an aspect of God, the will of God.
2)In order to create another God identical to THE God, the first God would have to become the second God, otherwise the second God would not be identical. The second God would occupy a different space/existence, etc... Not identical, thus there is no logical way for God to duplicate himself exactly, because it will always be something different than the original.
As soon as this logic becomes the accepted basis of discussion, the inclusion of suffering and other topics can have a framework that allows God to still be Tri-Omni, and the argument of "Problem Of Evil" goes away.
I invite you or anyone to explain why this doesn't hold up, without emotional appeal as the meat of the reply.
Opponents may then say, "Well then, God should have never created anything, if he can't do it without his creation suffering".
They may not however say, that God is not Omni-benevoent, since we see suffering simply becomes possible as soon as God creates.
The opponent will then feel obliged to point out, that maybe God can't create something perfect, but surely can create a possible existence with suffering minimized. Right?
The novice would reply, God gave man free will. Which accounts for suffering(I personally find that reply repulsive and weak, showing the presenter as out of replies).
So let's avoid that latter exchange, and volley something fresh back and forth.
The truth is, we do not know the degree to which something God creates deviates from being God, how far or near it is to the nature of God, or what other ramifications arise, as this "created" thing must occupy some space, effecting something beyond which we can't understand.
If this is the case, it becomes futile for the opponent to presume God can actualize a much better place, and is malevolent for choosing a deliberate excessively suffer filled place to have authored. We, are simply setting up Strawmen to make that claim.
