• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Absolute Truth

Flat Earth Kyle

Well-Known Member
I will post what I think to be absolutely true, but based on my earlier point, I do not think that everyone would see the same truth in these words:

"Bright but hidden, the Self dwells in the heart.
Everything that moves, breathes, opens, and closes
Lives in the Self. He is the source of love
And may be known through love but not through thought
He is the goal of life. Attain this goal!"

-Mundaka Upanishad

(God is called the Self)

Conscious spirit and unconscious matter
Both have existed since the dawn of time,
With maya appearing to connect them,
Misrepresenting joy as outside us.

When all these three are seen as one, the Self
Reveals his universal form and serves
As an instrument of the divine will.

All is change in the world of the senses,
But changeless is the supreme Lord of Love.
Meditate on him, be absorbed by him,
Wake up from this dream of separateness

-Shvetashvatara Upanishad

Okay, so the most clear claimed absolute thruths I got out of there was
all matter and spirit have always existed, unless the dawn of time represents a specific moment.

That and the only thing that never changes is God.
 

Flat Earth Kyle

Well-Known Member
fantôme profane;3271799 said:
(i X i) X (i X i) X 2 = 2

Works just fine. Mathematicians use imaginary numbers all the time.

Yeah I remember learning that in school.
the problem is each letter still symbolizes a real number.
for example if X+X= 2 then X = 1

That is unless you have another number that X could be that can be added by the same amount and still = 2
 
Last edited by a moderator:

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Yeah I remember learning that in school.
the problem is each letter still symbolizes a real number.
for example if X+X= 2 then X = 1

That is unless you have another number that X could be that can be added by the same amount and still = 2

I was using X as the symbol for multiplication, not as a variable. Sorry if you misunderstood that. "i" is an imaginary number. But "i" multiplied by "i" equals negative one.

Math is fun :)
 

Wannabe Yogi

Well-Known Member
Okay, sin being things that are destructive and righteousness being things that are constructive. Now is there construction and destruction? If yes, does that show that there is in existence some kind of law or order that effect our overall happiness and misery?

Yes there is order.
 

Madhuri

RF Goddess
Staff member
Premium Member
Okay, so the most clear claimed absolute thruths I got out of there was
all matter and spirit have always existed, unless the dawn of time represents a specific moment.

That and the only thing that never changes is God.

There is actually a lot more to it than that but to bring your comment back to my original point, the 'truth' we perceive is highly dependent on what knowledge and wisdom we have gained through life experience. Just because something is absolute truth, doesn't mean we automatically can recognise it. And something we even see absolute truth where there is none.
 

Flat Earth Kyle

Well-Known Member
fantôme profane;3271868 said:
I was using X as the symbol for multiplication, not as a variable. Sorry if you misunderstood that. "i" is an imaginary number. But "i" multiplied by "i" equals negative one.

Math is fun :)

I don't understand how i times i equals -1

-1 times -1 equals 1, and -1 times 1 equals -1 but a 1 is not a -1.

I guess because it is not possible to be a number it is called an unreal number. that makes sense.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
I don't understand how i times i equals -1

-1 times -1 equals 1, and -1 times 1 equals -1 but a 1 is not a -1.

I guess because it is not possible to be a number it is called an unreal number. that makes sense.
The point is (yes I do have one) is that things are not as simple and straight forward as you may think. Even in math we have grey areas.
 

PolyHedral

Superabacus Mystic
how about you try working with unreal numbers and tell me how that goes.
Would you like to try complex numbers, surreal numbers, vector arithmetic in Euclidean and non- metrics, matrix arithmetic over any of the above, finite fields, Albein groups, general groups, function spaces of all shapes and sizes, or perhaps something even more exotic? :D

For instance, when working in the field of integers mod 2, 1+1=0.

fantôme profane;3272142 said:
The point is (yes I do have one) is that things are not as simple and straight forward as you may think. Even in math we have grey areas.
There are no grey areas in mathematics; only assumptions you didn't realize you made.
 
Last edited:

WyattDerp

Active Member
I feel like what they are finding is the pixels within the pixels. What they previously predicative goes a lot deeper than they first realized, the question is, is there a foundation at the heart of it all that all things a built upon? I believe there is and that foundation is absolute truth.

I agree, but I doubt we can fully reveal those foundations. We can get better and better approximations, but even if there are no contradictions and no riddles left, it doesn't mean our model does fully represent the absolute truth, it would just mean we have nothing left to whack it against in order to improve it.
 
Top