• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Abuse of the "Funny" Rating

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
Does it count as abuse when you say Revoltingest's post is funny when you're just hoping he'll some day actually say something that's funny, like back in the old days.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Does it count as abuse when you say Revoltingest's post is funny when you're just hoping he'll some day actually say something that's funny, like back in the old days.
No frubal is abuse.
An ironic award is worth just as much as a sincere one.
 

FooYang

Active Member
So, basically anyone doing this is doing some sort of micro-aggression? :D

You know the problem with that is that you will have no real idea what the intent of either the author of the post is or that of the person clicking the "funny". Poe's Law, especially, Poe's Corollary applies and certainly demonstrates the dilemma.

In and effort to streamline the system and provide protection for the would be offenders as a lawyer often has to do for a guilty party, I request that the denizens of RF only click "funny" on any of my posts - that way your disdain and true appreciation are unbeknownst to me (my feelings are spared) and we can all live together in big-happy-harmony. :D

My thoughts exactly.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Denizens of the forums,

A while back an update to the forum software introduced a "likes" system as an alternative to our once beloved frubals. You may have noticed that negative ratings are not an option, which was an intentional decision by the site owner to support the forum mission:


As a community of diverse cultural and religious backgrounds, our aim is to provide a civil environment, informative, respectful and welcoming where people of diverse beliefs can discuss, compare and debate religion while engaging in fellowship with one another.​

On occasion, we've noticed members abusing the "likes" system by using "funny" in a pejorative, mocking, or trollish fashion. When someone posts a sincerely held belief and a bunch of people start rating it "funny," that isn't exactly respectful and welcoming. We wanted to let you know that we consider behavior like that to be in violation of the rules, specifically Rule 3 or Rule 9 (see the full text of the rules here). If we see a pattern of abusing the "funny" rating, a member may be infracted as per any other piece of rule violating content. It felt prudent to give you all a more direct heads up about this, as it seems to be becoming more of an issue.

Feel free to ask questions for clarification within this thread, but do keep in mind that discussion of specific cases of moderation need to stay in Site Feedback as per Rule 2.
I have a suggestion.

Remove the icons altogether.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
This OP did help with the sarcastic use of 'funny' . It improved the forum, in my view.
It still happens to me from time to time.

I gave up reporting the infractions though. Not worth the time in doing so.

Folks here are smart I figure. They can see who those people are anyways and make their own judgments.

It's all rather silly though to get all worked up over. (Pun intended?)
 

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member
Hi folks! Just wanted to post a reminder that this rule is still in effect. Please don't rate posts as "funny" in a pejorative, mocking, or trollish way. Our aim is to make the forum welcoming and respectful.

Thanks all!
 
Top