And if we rate--as I just did--this one as funny....?Also... this likely being my most rated post makes me sad...
Those of you who rated that OP as funny... I shake a stick at thee!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And if we rate--as I just did--this one as funny....?Also... this likely being my most rated post makes me sad...
Those of you who rated that OP as funny... I shake a stick at thee!
Already taken care of.
Speaking of which, someone thought it'd be cute to stuff toilet paper down the sink again... clean up in aisle six!
No frubal is abuse.Does it count as abuse when you say Revoltingest's post is funny when you're just hoping he'll some day actually say something that's funny, like back in the old days.
Ya frubal seeking, fake bacon hatin', grease comsumin' hoggerdoodle!No frubal is abuse.
An ironic award is worth just as much as a sincere one.
One must consider whether the recipient has a sense of humor.Anyone else find giving Quint a funny rating a tempting idea?
So, basically anyone doing this is doing some sort of micro-aggression?
You know the problem with that is that you will have no real idea what the intent of either the author of the post is or that of the person clicking the "funny". Poe's Law, especially, Poe's Corollary applies and certainly demonstrates the dilemma.
In and effort to streamline the system and provide protection for the would be offenders as a lawyer often has to do for a guilty party, I request that the denizens of RF only click "funny" on any of my posts - that way your disdain and true appreciation are unbeknownst to me (my feelings are spared) and we can all live together in big-happy-harmony.
I have a suggestion.Denizens of the forums,
A while back an update to the forum software introduced a "likes" system as an alternative to our once beloved frubals. You may have noticed that negative ratings are not an option, which was an intentional decision by the site owner to support the forum mission:
As a community of diverse cultural and religious backgrounds, our aim is to provide a civil environment, informative, respectful and welcoming where people of diverse beliefs can discuss, compare and debate religion while engaging in fellowship with one another.
On occasion, we've noticed members abusing the "likes" system by using "funny" in a pejorative, mocking, or trollish fashion. When someone posts a sincerely held belief and a bunch of people start rating it "funny," that isn't exactly respectful and welcoming. We wanted to let you know that we consider behavior like that to be in violation of the rules, specifically Rule 3 or Rule 9 (see the full text of the rules here). If we see a pattern of abusing the "funny" rating, a member may be infracted as per any other piece of rule violating content. It felt prudent to give you all a more direct heads up about this, as it seems to be becoming more of an issue.
Feel free to ask questions for clarification within this thread, but do keep in mind that discussion of specific cases of moderation need to stay in Site Feedback as per Rule 2.
Oh, I just realized I just responded to an op from 2017.I have a suggestion.
Remove the icons altogether.
Oh, I just realized I just responded to an op from 2017.
It still happens to me from time to time.This OP did help with the sarcastic use of 'funny' . It improved the forum, in my view.
......Sometimes, I write out my emoji if I do not find one to fit. For example : wonder :