According to Science - You are a Satanic Being

[Orias]

We are carbon based life, and made of biophotons.

The carbon atom has the atomic number 6. The atom is made of 6 electrons, 6 protons, and 6 neutrons.

The Latin words "Christ" and "Lucifer" both essentially mean "bearer of light".

"Satan" translates to "adversary" or "opposition", so we know Satan is definitely not agreeable. And we can also say that if God/Satan duality is merely a human construct, then it's inherently reflective of our own nature.

 

[Father Heathen]

Looks like we have our stand-in for popeadope.

 

[Orias]

Is that another member?

 

[Shadow Wolf]

The carbon atom has the atomic number 6. The atom is made of 6 electrons, 6 protons, and 6 neutrons.

666 is the typo of the AD era that mislead poets and metal musicians alike over the centuries. It's more accurately 616 according to older/original documents.

 

[Orias]

I'm both flattered and insulted.

 

[Orias]

666 is the typo of the AD era that mislead poets and metal musicians alike over the centuries. It's more accurately 616 according to older/original documents.

Hmm
... I'd like to see that.

Because even in Septuagint it's still 666 and in many Hebrew translations .

 

[Valjean]

We are carbon based life, and made of biophotons.

The carbon atom has the atomic number 6. The atom is made of 6 electrons, 6 protons, and 6 neutrons.

The Latin words "Christ" and "Lucifer" both essentially mean "bearer of light".

"Satan" translates to "adversary" or "opposition", so we know Satan is definitely not agreeable. And we can also say that if God/Satan duality is merely a human construct, then it's inherently reflective of our own nature.

What does this mean?
I'm reading a lot of assorted statements, some unsupported. Could someone sort them out for me?

and what's a biophoton?

 

[Sir Doom]

Biophotons, eh?

Be honest. It's word-of-the-day toilet paper, isn't it?

 

[Orias]

What does this mean?
I'm reading a lot of assorted statements, some unsupported. Could someone sort them out for me?

Which do you believe is "unsupported"?

 

[Orias]

Biophotons, eh?

Be honest. It's word-of-the-day toilet paper, isn't it?

No but if you look at my content I made a similar but much more in depth post back in 2011 about the same thing .

 

[Sir Doom]

What does this mean?
I'm reading a lot of assorted statements, some unsupported. Could someone sort them out for me?

I'm pretty sure he's not really aware of what carbon-based means as he seems to think it has something to do with demons.

 

[Orias]

and what's a biophoton?

Basically, it's light. It's in everything we can observe. Even darkness.

 

[Sir Doom]

No but if you look at my content I made a similar but much more in depth post back in 2011 about the same thing .

Did I happen to comment back then?

 

[Orias]

I'm pretty sure he's not really aware of what carbon-based means as he seems to think it has something to do with demons.

So because I believe demons are real I can't understand what carbon based means? That seems unreasonable .

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Hmm
... I'd like to see that.

Because even in Septuagint it's still 666 and in many Hebrew translations .

Number of the Beast - Wikipedia

Although Irenaeus (2nd century AD) affirmed the number to be 666 and reported several scribal errors of the number, theologians have doubts about the traditional reading[12] because of the appearance of the figure 616 in the Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C; Paris—one of the four great uncial codices), as well as in the Latin version of Tyconius (DCXVI, ed. Souter in the Journal of Theology, SE, April 1913), and in an ancient Armenian version (ed. Conybeare, 1907). Irenaeus knew about the 616 reading, but did not adopt it (Haer. v.30,3). In the 380s, correcting the existing Latin-language version of the New Testament (commonly referred to as the Vetus Latina), Jerome retained "666".[13][14]
Fragment from Papyrus 115 (P115) of Revelation in the 66th vol. of the Oxyrhynchus series (P. Oxy. 4499).[15] Has the number of the beast as χιϛ, 616.
Around 2005, a fragment from Papyrus 115, taken from the Oxyrhynchus site, was discovered at the Oxford University's Ashmolean Museum. It gave the beast's number as 616 χιϛʹ. This fragment is the oldest manuscript (about 1,700 years old) of Revelation 13 found as of 2017.[2][3] Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus, known before the Papyrus 115 finding but dating to after it, has 616 written in full: ἑξακόσιοι δέκα ἕξ, hexakosioi deka hex (lit. "six hundred and sixteen").[16]
Papyrus 115 and Ephraemi Rescriptus have led some scholars to regard 616 as the original number of the beast.[17] According to Paul Louis, "The number 666 has been substituted for 616 either by analogy with 888, the [Greek] number of Jesus (Gustav Adolf Deissmann), or because it is a triangular number, the sum of the first 36 numbers (1+2+3+4+5+6+...+36 = 666)"[18]

The Numerology of the Beast

But the really suggestive hint is that the oldest manuscripts don't agree on the number: some have 616 instead. It's much harder to concoct an explanation that fits both numbers, and only one of the proposed interpretations of the Number of the Beast accounts for both: Nero. Remember it was NeRON QeiSaR in Hebrew. But the final N of NeRON is optional: the name can also be rendered NeRO, subtracting the letter N [Nun] and its value of 50 to get -- 616.

It's not hard to understand why 616 was largely forgotten. Mathematically, neither that number nor 666 is particularly remarkable: about all that can be said for them is that one is a product of small primes [616=2·2·2·7·11] and the other is a triangular number [666=1+2+3+...+36]. But for memorability it's no contest. Sometimes the triply repeated digit 6 is all it takes to trigger a vision of the Beast -- as in the six letters in each of the three parts of the late President Reagan's full name, Ronald Wilson Reagan; or the triple W's of the World-Wide Web, with W representing the sixth Hebrew letter. Going back to chemistry, some have even seen the Beast not in Viagra but in life itself, based on the carbon atom with its 6 protons, 6 neutrons, and 6 electrons!

Revelation! 666 is not the number of the beast (it's a devilish 616)

A newly discovered fragment of the oldest surviving copy of the New Testament indicates that, as far as the Antichrist goes, theologians, scholars, heavy metal groups, and television evangelists have got the wrong number. Instead of 666, it's actually the far less ominous 616.
...
Professor David Parker, Professor of New Testament Textual Criticism and Paleography at the University of Birmingham, thinks that 616, although less memorable than 666, is the original. He said: "This is an example of gematria, where numbers are based on the numerical values of letters in people's names. Early Christians would use numbers to hide the identity of people who they were attacking: 616 refers to the Emperor Caligula."

 

[Orias]

Did I happen to comment back then?

Nope. It was before you're time young whippersnapper

 

[Sir Doom]

So because I believe demons are real I can't understand what carbon based means? That seems unreasonable .

Alright then, indulge me. Why do you suppose the atomic weight of carbon has any bearing on our relative 'adversarialness' ? Specifically how it results in our carbon-baseness further leading to our adversarialness. If you wouldn't mind connecting those dots. While you're at it, feel free to explain the connection between biophotons, the atomic weight of carbon, carbon-baseness and finally adversarialness.

 

[Orias]

Number of the Beast - Wikipedia

The Numerology of the Beast

Revelation! 666 is not the number of the beast (it's a devilish 616)

Interesting. Thanks. Although it doesn't make much sense

616 (number) - Wikipedia

Let's not forget that October used to also be the 8th month. So it is possible. I love some etymology.

 

[Valjean]

Which do you believe is "unsupported"?

" ...made of biophotons."

What's a biophoton?

"The Latin words "Christ" and "Lucifer" both essentially mean "bearer of light"."

I thought 'Christ' meant "annointed."

"... we know Satan is definitely not agreeable."

We have no evidence of a personified "adversary."

"...it's inherently reflective of our own nature."

In what ways, and what's the significance of this?

 

[Unveiled Artist]

We are carbon based life, and made of biophotons.

The carbon atom has the atomic number 6. The atom is made of 6 electrons, 6 protons, and 6 neutrons.

The Latin words "Christ" and "Lucifer" both essentially mean "bearer of light".

"Satan" translates to "adversary" or "opposition", so we know Satan is definitely not agreeable. And we can also say that if God/Satan duality is merely a human construct, then it's inherently reflective of our own nature.

I dont understand how the first part relates to your last.

Though, do you mean our nature is good/god and bad/satan?

We have a dual nature?