• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

actually how to stop Cruz Thread

robocop (actually)

robocop (actually)

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
BSM1

BSM1

What? Me worry?
Altfish said:
I fear a very nasty campaign.
The dossier on Trump will be massive

Therefore we have,,,

Benghazi + lies v Failed businesses + lies + bigoted views
Click to expand...

A failed business is never a sign of failure, btw; not trying again is the sign of failure. Which lies does Hillary have on Trump that the rest of the Republican field does not?
 
metis

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
BSM1 said:
It was her watch.



It was her watch.
Click to expand...
Then I assume you blame Bush for 9-11 as well, right? and Reagan for the loss of American troops in Lebanon, right? and Lincoln for the civil war, right? and...
 
metis

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
BSM1 said:
Pretty sure he's been anally examined countless times. Nothing to see here.
Click to expand...
Ya know, you claimed a while back that you're not a Republican, and yet you have continually condemned Democrats on sometimes flimsy excuses while at the same time providing excuses for Republicans when they did just as bad if not worse. I didn't believe your claim several days ago and I still don't believe your claim today because you've had this same general pattern for as long as I've seen you here at RF. It's your right to defend whom you want to defend of course, but you clearly are a Republican, whether you want to call yourself that or not. I think that maybe the only one you're fooling is yourself.

Own it.
 
BSM1

BSM1

What? Me worry?
metis said:
Then I assume you blame Bush for 9-11 as well, right? and Reagan for the loss of American troops in Lebanon, right? and Lincoln for the civil war, right? and...
Click to expand...

They owned up to their responsibilities.

metis said:
Ya know, you claimed a while back that you're not a Republican, and yet you have continually condemned Democrats on sometimes flimsy excuses while at the same time providing excuses for Republicans when they did just as bad if not worse. I didn't believe your claim several days ago and I still don't believe your claim today because you've had this same general pattern for as long as I've seen you here at RF. It's your right to defend whom you want to defend of course, but you clearly are a Republican, whether you want to call yourself that or not. I think that maybe the only one you're fooling is yourself.

Own it.
Click to expand...

I am conservative, not Republican. I only condemn Democrats for their foolish, job-killing, totalitarian, soul-sucking, liberal ideas. I am staunchly pro choice and I don't give a damn if Steve marries Henry. I would probably get booted out of more Christian churches than not. I am also adamantly independent and believe the less government the better. I do not like anyone doing things for that I can and should do myself. I believe that, although both parties are guilty, the Democrats are unabashedly power mad and would say and/or do anything to gain and hold power. Although I believe Trump is not the best presidential candidate that ever kissed a baby, he strikes me as the most honest and transparent. I believe that a Clinton presidency would push us close to the edge of disaster whereas a Sanders presidency would totally and quickly destroy us a nation and a society. Other than that, I have no strong feelings either way.
 
metis

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
BSM1 said:
They owned up to their responsibilities.
Click to expand...
Oh, like when Reagan "cut & run" by pulling out our troops without responding militarily? Or when Bush attacked a country that didn't attack us, thus bogging us down in a no-win war costing many American lives and a fortune of money?

If those are "responsibilities", maybe we should seek more "irresponsibilities".
 
robocop (actually)

robocop (actually)

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
BSM1, you just said that (a) you are conservative and (b) the only problem with Democrats is when they are liberal. Does that not preclude you from the liberal forum? I have told my economic system in the Human Affairs thread, which is capitalist and communist. I am concerned that the human race should be careful (conservative) but want to be fair and kind to all (liberal). But you seem to be specifically conservative and not liberal, based on what you just said.
 
BSM1

BSM1

What? Me worry?
robocop (actually) said:
BSM1, you just said that (a) you are conservative and (b) the only problem with Democrats is when they are liberal. Does that not preclude you from the liberal forum? I have told my economic system in the Human Affairs thread, which is capitalist and communist. I am concerned that the human race should be careful (conservative) but want to be fair and kind to all (liberal). But you seem to be specifically conservative and not liberal, based on what you just said.
Click to expand...

You are so right. I simply wasn't paying attention. See ya.
 
robocop (actually)

robocop (actually)

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
The media is decimating Trump and not Cruz. Cruz said that the Brussels terrorists were refugees and that there were no-cop zones in Belgium. I heard on CNN that both of those statements were lie. If Cruz can tell two lies in two consecutive sentences, why can't the media go after him? Cruz's issue policy should be plenty of cannon fodder.

Just look at his positions on education, the environment, health care, and tax reform.
 
Last edited:
metis

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Jake1001 said:
It might be tough to stop "Lyin" Ted Cruz now !!
Click to expand...
I highly doubt he'll get the nomination-- way too many Republicans hate the guy, plus it wouldn't be long in a campaign if he gets the nomination that he'd really anger a great many independents.

By chance did you hear Lindsey Graham's comments about him if a Republican senator shot Cruz dead and the trial was held in the Senate? Not one senator would find him guilty, according to Graham.
 
BSM1

BSM1

What? Me worry?
metis said:
I highly doubt he'll get the nomination-- way too many Republicans hate the guy, plus it wouldn't be long in a campaign if he gets the nomination that he'd really anger a great many independents.

By chance did you hear Lindsey Graham's comments about him if a Republican senator shot Cruz dead and the trial was held in the Senate? Not one senator would find him guilty, according to Graham.
Click to expand...


Lindsey who?
 
J

Jake1001

Computer Simulator
metis said:
I highly doubt he'll get the nomination-- way too many Republicans hate the guy, plus it wouldn't be long in a campaign if he gets the nomination that he'd really anger a great many independents.

By chance did you hear Lindsey Graham's comments about him if a Republican senator shot Cruz dead and the trial was held in the Senate? Not one senator would find him guilty, according to Graham.
Click to expand...
Great comment, thanks! I agree, the likely nominee is Kasich, only taking his home state of Ohio, :).
 
metis

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Jake1001 said:
Great comment, thanks! I agree, the likely nominee is Kasich, only taking his home state of Ohio, :).
Click to expand...
Thanks, but I think you've gone too far ;)-- I don't think it's likely to be Kasich-- but who knows.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top