Administration To Rely on "Alternative Facts" To Run The Country

[Lyndon]

They even have their own photoshopped pictures of the inauguration!! for a balanced, objective look at Trumps speech I suggest watching this video

 

[Lyndon]

Here's the actual attendance Friday in time lapse video, notice at the very end the people are starting to leave so it is not a fake video that does not show the full crowd, obviously fake pictures are cropping up photoshopped by Trump supporters who will stop at nothing to lie about the facts.

 

[Luciferi Baphomet]

Apparently it was before. CNN refute themselves. If you watch CNN's gigapixel shots (which I must say is quite impressive, and just shows how big brother can watch you from way back) you'll see that as usual, CNN fake news.

Source: Gigapixel: The inauguration of Donald Trump

So how many people were actually at his inauguration?

 

[JakofHearts]

So how many people were actually at his inauguration?

Don't know, but certainly more than what the left try to portray.

 

[Lyndon]

Somewhere between 450,000 and no more than 1 million, probably closer to 450,000. Obama was estimated to have 1.8 million in 2009.

 

[Luciferi Baphomet]

Don't know, but certainly more than what the left try to portray.

Oh I see. Ok then.

 

[psychoslice]

Because more people like something doesn't mean its better, if you follow the herd you end up standing in manure.

 

[columbus]

So how many people were actually at his inauguration?

Nobody knows and nobody cares. This thread is about the Trump administration lying when the facts are available to those who care about such things.
Tom

 

[Luciferi Baphomet]

Nobody knows and nobody cares. This thread is about the Trump administration lying when the facts are available to those who care about such things.
Tom

Hey I just want to know.

 

[columbus]

Hey I just want to know.

Informed people realize that nobody knows exactly, but that the different methods of estimating give similar results. Whether the results are important or not is purely an opinion.
Tom

 

[Quagmire]

"Alternative Facts". Very Orwellian.

Newspeak - Wikipedia

 

[tytlyf]

So that's what RW media calls it now. Their facts have always been a little off. Nice to see the meltdown.

 

[columbus]

I don't see what is so hard to understand here. The number of attendees doesn't much matter. Obama was the first black president and Washington DC has a huge black population. It is unsurprising that his inauguration had over twice the attendance.
It's the lying and justifying the lies that is the only real story of note here.
Tom

 

[Skwim]

Apparently it was before. CNN refute themselves. If you watch CNN's gigapixel shots (which I must say is quite impressive, and just shows how big brother can watch you from way back) you'll see that as usual, CNN fake news.

Source: Gigapixel: The inauguration of Donald Trump

Compare that to video images of both inaugurations moments before the swearing in.

source & VIDEO


.​

 

[Lyndon]

That's Obama 2013 which was something like half as many people as Obama 2009. Obama 2013 also seems to be the source of the phony picture Jakof hearts posted above. It obviously wasn't from Trumps inauguration.

 

[JakofHearts]

Compare that to video images of both inaugurations moments before the swearing in.

source & VIDEO


.​

This would probably go through one ear and out the other, but this is my thoughts on this whole shebang.

I listened to a guy who was selling Trump shirts talking about how on the eve of Obama's inauguration (2009), he witnessed loads more people. Obama was after all making history as the first black president and his slogan of "hope" and "yes we can" resonated with many who were wary of war. Unfortunate that Obama was a rather useless leader who instead made thing worse.

In terms of numbers, I don't see why Obama would have more even if we are to be picky on certain angled pictures. Washington DC is predominantly democratic in its leanings and have been loudly against Trump from the start and despite this, Trump's inauguration had an impressive turnout, nonetheless.

 

[lewisnotmiller]

I think it's more a problem of lack of class, lack of civility. They used to have...not sure what the word is for it.

A thin veneer of superficial politeness?

Re-editing will do that for ya...

 

[David1967]

So you're saying you seriously think there were more people at Trumps inauguration than at Obama's in 2009, and your evidence is??????????????????????????????????????????????

No, I'm not saying that at all. I honestly have not given the subject of who's crowd was bigger any thought. I think its irrelevant and don't care. But, ,just because someone voted for someone different from you does not make them stupid or gullible.

 

[Lyndon]

No, I'm not saying that at all. I honestly have not given the subject of who's crowd was bigger any thought. I think its irrelevant and don't care. But, ,just because someone voted for someone different from you does not make them stupid or gullible.

I said they're stupid or gullible if they believe more people attended Trump's Inauguration than Obama's in 2009, read my posts before you quote.

 

[McBell]

Don't know, but certainly more than what the left try to portray.

Based on?