Lemme see if I get this right Fluffster
So, apples really can't ever be bananas? :sad4:
Except for banapples.
What is your concept of God? What is your concept of love?
So you'd reject this because you cannot be enlightened by mystery? I'm a mystic, and I'd really have to disagree with all my heart if this is, infact, what you mean.
For me God is an approximation of many different belief systems. I can't really tell you any of his characteristics since there are too many versions of God for any single characteristic to be consistent across them. I can think of belief systems where God is all powerful and where he is weaker than humans, where he is a single entity and where he is part of everything etc etc.
My concept of love is very specific but the vital component that differentiates it with God is that love is merely an emotion and I know of no belief system that deifies an emotion. Christianity, for example, clearly does not hold Jesus to be an emotion.
So that leaves us with metaphor...
So you'd reject this because you cannot be enlightened by mystery? I'm a mystic, and I'd really have to disagree with all my heart if this is, infact, what you mean.
We must have different ideas of mystery and enlightenment because in my mind they are directly opposed.
Mystery is something that occludes the truth and enlightenment is something that reveals the truth. If you have the truth then you can present it in a mysterious way by making it unnecessarily complicated or you can present it in an enlightening way by explaining it clearly.
Think of a mystery novel. The whole point is that you can sort of work out whodunnit but not for sure until the mystery is revealed at the end. A much more boring way would be to simply note down the key statistics (who, how, what, why) on the first page. Mysteries make for interesting stories but I don't think they are as useful for explaining the truth. You can be enlightened by mystery but I don't see how they can be
more enlightening than a simple explanation.
At any rate "God is love" is one mystery, in my opinion, that could do with less repetition and more elaboration. If there is no difference between stating that God is identical to love and that God expresses love to perfection. I know it seems a tad pedantic but if you trace God's other characteristics throughout the centuries (omnipotence is one quality in particular) then you can easily see the way they change by putting one vague explanation on top of another until the original meaning is lost.