• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

AI chatbot shows promise in talking people out of conspiracy theories

We Never Know

No Slack
Being its about AI and conspiracy theories, I figured this would be best in the debate forum.

I imagine this could be good as well as bad.

AI chatbot shows promise in talking people out of conspiracy theories

"You might know someone who thinks the Moon landing was faked or COVID-19 vaccines are full of microchips. Believers cling tenaciously to such conspiracy theories, which have little basis in reality, even when presented with contrary evidence. But according to research published today in Science, some people do change their minds when fact-based arguments are delivered by an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot instead of another human being. Personalized conversations with this “debunkbot” can turn even hardcore conspiracy theorists into budding skeptics, the researchers report.

It’s really promising to see how AI can play a role in combating misinformation and conspiracy theories,” says Jan-Willem van Prooijen, a behavioral scientist at the Free University of Amsterdam who wasn’t involved in the new study. Generative AI is notorious for spreading falsehoods, most notably through the use of deepfakes, so Van Prooijen finds it “refreshing” to see it used as a force for good.

Be it the belief that the CIA assassinated former President John F. Kennedy or that Area 51 houses alien corpses, nearly half the U.S. population believes in one conspiracy theory or another, according to some estimates. Many psychologists think these beliefs help fulfill underlying psychological needs, such as the desire for security. But hypotheses about such “subterranean motivations” are hard to test, says Thomas Costello, a psychologist at American University and lead author of the new study. The new findings provide “one of the first really strong pieces of evidence that they’re not the whole story,” he says, “or maybe, in fact, that they’re totally wrong..."

 
Last edited:

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
One question.
Let's say a very wealthy person commits a very bad crime involving US secret services.

Don't you think he will do literally anything to pay the media so they call those people who suspect him "conspiracy theorists"?

Thank you for answering.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Let's say a very wealthy person commits a very bad crime involving US secret services. Don't you think he will do literally anything to pay the media so they call those people who suspect him "conspiracy theorists"?
That's the other side of this issue. While there are false conspiracy hypotheses, conspiracies occur frequently, by which I mean a malevolent or otherwise morally challenged plan made in private by two or more persons.

There are two competing theories of 911, but only one is called a conspiracy theory (so-called 911 truthers) even though both allege conspiracies, but by different actors. The officially accepted account is that of a conspiracy of Arabs, which alleges that they conspired to commit the crime before so doing, which most people accept as a correct account. But it is still a conspiracy theory.

The present matter of Israel conspiring to outfit Hezbollah with exploding pagers, which Israel claims responsibility for, is a "theory" of Israelis plotting to kill Arabs in secret whether it is fact or not.

Yes, criminals have a stake in calling accusations about their nefarious preparations for criminal activity "conspiracy theories" in the hope that some equate conspiracy theory with unfounded speculation and accusation.
AI cannot replace the human mind.
I think it can equal or outperform human minds in many areas already and will only get "smarter" as smart people contribute further to its fund of knowledge. Let's apply it to one of Trump's rambling and incoherent pronouncements:

It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that — because — child care is child care ... It’s something, you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to, but they’ll get used to it very quickly, and it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.

Here's the AI rewrite. You decide whether Trump or AI is "smarter." The AI is still factually as incorrect as Trump was about tariffs, but the AI version, which is more concise, coherent, and grammatically correct, is a huge improvement:

"Child care is a critical issue, and it's necessary for our country. However, when we consider the revenue generated by imposing taxes on foreign nations, which they will adapt to, the figures are significantly larger than any domestic numbers, including those for child care. This substantial taxation on imported products will not deter business with us, and the resulting income is expected to be so considerable that it will address our needs, including child care. I anticipate that these measures, along with cutting waste and fraud, will eliminate our deficits in a relatively short time."
 

an anarchist

Your local loco.
RF is a tool of the deep state. Or at least there are one or two on here that could be described as a tool. :rolleyes:
1726918438696.jpeg
 

Secret Chief

Veteran Member
AI talks people out of conspiracy theories

Can it be any more obvious???
So if I try to persuade someone that Saturn is actually not the source of holographic experiences, broadcast by reptiles and which humanity interprets as reality, does that obviously indicate that I too am a tool of the deep state rather than simply indicating that my friend should be sectioned under the Mental Health Act (1983) ?
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
AI can start with the simpler ones and then go on to the YEC believers - with a place awaiting a very patient AI on RF of course. :oops:
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
AI translations are incredibly flawed, which demonstrates that AI cannot replace the human mind. :)
I dunno about that. Ever play a game of Go against an ai thst can machine learn? Unlike Chess, Go actually takes planning and strategical thinking and planning.
 
Top