• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

All are redeemed says Pope.

Vouthon

Dominus Deus tuus ignis consumens est
Premium Member
Imagine a believer in reincarnation saying all bad people are coming back as worms, even non-believers. Non-believers would respond by pointing out they are not coming back as worms because they do not believe in reincarnation...

If he sincerely believed I was coming back as a worm, but said it with real sincerity and with good intent, I honestly wouldn't bother but would simply respect his conscience. I can't fault him for viewing the world through the lens of his religious belief. I could fault him for using that religious belief to be hurtful or exclusive of others, if he intended to do so. Its the thought and intent that counts for me. The belief structure its cloaked in, doesn't particularly bother me. Therein is where we differ :) Yes, I might say to him that I don't personally believe in reincarnation, however I would thank him for his kind intent if he meant kindness by it.
 
Last edited:

Vouthon

Dominus Deus tuus ignis consumens est
Premium Member
My one comment of some discontent is from Hans Kung. Oh, we all agree that Pope Francis’ humble and simple message of charity as the key is whole heartedly welcome and true. But must Hans Kung do so by drawing a negative image of his predecessor? What of it if Benedict wore the garments of a pontiff, does this make him an elitist?.... does it define his papacy or message in even the most miniscule of ways? For me, I have never marveled at a pope as I did with the soft, humble, brilliant teachings of Benedict. Yes, humble. Astounding beauty and truth. Let not the red $200 loafers purchased from a Mexican peasant cobbler cause you too much disdain, Hans. He would have been wise and fair not to have brought up Benedict at all is my contention.

God created different men with different talents for different roles and different times. Pope Benedict’s reign and skillful theological teachings put in very simple thoughts and words, was as welcome and important as any other. IMO.

Amen! :bow:

I agree with you completely Thau. I had great respect for our Pope Emeritus when he was pope. His theological acumen and encyclicals on love, hope and the economy were replete with wisdom for me. He served the church valiantly throughout his life and he will always remain dear to my heart.

What you've got to remember about Kung, is that he is biased. Benedict XVI was the cause of him losing his license to officially teach Catholic dogma back when he was Cardinal Ratzinger and Head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Ever since Kung has had "it in" for Benedict, in some manner or other. Its very raw between them.

Therefore, one must always be aware of Kung's bias and treat it somewhat with a pinch of salt. It was his kind words towards Francis that interested me. His statements towards Benedict, I do not agree with nor think are necessary in light of the latter's brave decision to resign and prodigious life of service to the Church.

As you say we must respect the distinctness of people. God works His will through different people :yes:
 
Last edited:

thau

Well-Known Member
All who do good are redeemed through Christ, says the Pope.

Pope Francis Says Atheists Who Do Good Are Redeemed, Not Just Catholics

good stance, good points, and good deceleration in my opinion. I think this is a good sign for the church and I hope the Pope continues with this as an agenda. I think the world needs more of this.

Thanks again for posting this. Question: Did you originally post this under the "Theological Concepts" forum? I thought I first saw it under "Religious Debates" or "General Religious Debates?" And if I am correct, then can you speculate as to why the moderators would have moved it to this place ---- a place that is so infrequently visited it loses most of its impact?
Thanks.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
Thanks again for posting this. Question: Did you originally post this under the "Theological Concepts" forum? I thought I first saw it under "Religious Debates" or "General Religious Debates?" And if I am correct, then can you speculate as to why the moderators would have moved it to this place ---- a place that is so infrequently visited it loses most of its impact?
Thanks.

No I posted it in thelogical concepts becaue I wanted tto avoivd debate and discuss this as as theological concept.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
It's nothing to do with being right or wrong, it's about accepting another's worldview as legitimate for that person.
Your wrong. It has to do with the theological concept of salvation. It has to do with church teachings. It has nothing to do with what you belive as a none catholic, accept that it does not matter wht you believe but how you behave if catholic church is right.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
I think it makes more sense as the pope said then the other way around. I think it also adds more meaning to Jesuses story.
 

Secret Chief

Degrow!
Your wrong. It has to do with the theological concept of salvation. It has to do with church teachings. It has nothing to do with what you belive as a none catholic, accept that it does not matter wht you believe but how you behave if catholic church is right.

This is an open forum and that is my opinion, I am not wrong: my opinion is contrary to yours. The pope's words are addressed to all, including non catholics . I just pointed out church teachings do not apply to atheists. Or do you think in some way they do?
 

Shiranui117

Pronounced Shee-ra-noo-ee
Premium Member
Where in the NT does it AGREE with the pope? I'm Waiting!
1 Timothy 2:1-6
Therefore I exhort first of all that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for all men, 2 for kings and all who are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence. 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, 4 who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time,

John 3:16
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.

Colossians 1:19-20
19 For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell, 20 and by Him to reconcile all things to Himself, by Him, whether things on earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of His cross.

2 Corinthians 5:17-20
17 Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new. 18 Now all things are of God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation, 19 that is, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them, and has committed to us the word of reconciliation.

Bam.
 

Jayell

Jayell
1 Timothy 2:1-6
Therefore I exhort first of all that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for all men, 2 for kings and all who are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence. 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, 4 who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time,

John 3:16
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.

Colossians 1:19-20
19 For it pleased the Father that in Him all the fullness should dwell, 20 and by Him to reconcile all things to Himself, by Him, whether things on earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of His cross.

2 Corinthians 5:17-20
17 Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new. 18 Now all things are of God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation, 19 that is, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them, and has committed to us the word of reconciliation.

Bam.
Do you not know all All those scriptures (beside John 3:16) were written to BELIEVERS, so keep that in mind. If God so loved everyone in the World who ever lived and will save ALL, then the pope is still WRONG cuz he said ONLY those who do good. RIGHT? Where it says ALL it means ALL that BELEIVE. We're saved BY His Grace through FAITH. (EPH 2:8)
 

Jayell

Jayell
EPh 2:8,9 goes on to say, "And not of Yourselves" WHAT? you mean there's nothing I can do to save myself? (no deeds) But wait is also says, "NOT BY WORKS" Case CLOSED! There's no deed we can think of to get us to heaven. "SO That NO ONE can boast." THe pope is Lying to the world!
 

Shiranui117

Pronounced Shee-ra-noo-ee
Premium Member
Do you not know all All those scriptures (beside John 3:16) were written to BELIEVERS, so keep that in mind.
They were written TO believers, yes, but does that mean that Christians=all people, or the entire world?

If God so loved everyone in the World who ever lived and will save ALL, then the pope is still WRONG cuz he said ONLY those who do good. RIGHT?
Wrong. You're misreading 1 Timothy 2. It says that God wills that all men be saved. God wants everyone to be saved, and Jesus gave Himself as a ransom for all men.

Where did I ever say that God will definitely fo sho 100 percent save everyone? I said this in the other topic in the General Religious Debates forum (man it's confusing having the same conversation in two threads lol)

Originally Posted by Shiranui117
Yes, we must accept and continue in our redemption in order to be saved--but we are all redeemed, whether or not we believe.

Where it says ALL it means ALL that BELEIVE.
How do you know? On what authority do you say this?

EPh 2:8,9 goes on to say, "And not of Yourselves" WHAT? you mean there's nothing I can do to save myself? (no deeds) But wait is also says, "NOT BY WORKS" Case CLOSED! There's no deed we can think of to get us to heaven. "SO That NO ONE can boast." THe pope is Lying to the world!
:facepalm: See this post that I made in the other thread:

Originally Posted by Shiranui117
Then how do you make sense of Revelations 20:12-13?
And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books. The sea gave up the dead who were in it, and Death and Hades delivered up the dead who were in them. And they were judged, each one according to his works.

Faith itself is a work. "To have faith" is an action, not just a state of being.

If anything, we Christians are going to be judged much more strictly on the Last Day, since we have the fullness of truth.

Christ says this in Luke 12:47-48:
47 And that servant who knew his master’s will, and did not prepare himself or do according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes. 48 But he who did not know, yet committed things deserving of stripes, shall be beaten with few. For everyone to whom much is given, from him much will be required; and to whom much has been committed, of him they will ask the more.

Yes, we must accept and continue in our redemption in order to be saved--but we are all redeemed, whether or not we believe.

Also, I see you have no answer to the rest of the Scripture I posted. Are you going to concede the argument and admit that Jesus has redeemed everyone and everything, as the Scriptures teach?

No, we do not save ourselves, nor can we ever; above all else, we need God's love and grace. But we DO need to cooperate with that love and grace for our salvation, and we do most certainly have our own part to play in our salvation.
--END OLD POST--

Philippians 2:12
Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling;

1 Corinthians 15:1-2
Moreover, brethren, I declare to you the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand, 2 by which also you are saved, if you hold fast that word which I preached to you—unless you believed in vain.

I could post so much more on this, but I would like to keep the topic focused on not HOW we're saved, but WHO can be saved--since this is the point of the topic. We can move on to being saved by faith, or faith+works (which are the same thing) after we've settled that.
 
Last edited:

InChrist

Free4ever
I believe the scriptures are clear in revealing that Jesus Christ died to pay for all the sins of the world and that salvation is available to everyone, yet that salvation is not applied to one's live until their faith and trust in placed in Christ as their Savior.
 

Jayell

Jayell
No, faith is not a work it's a Gift. Eph 2:8,9 makes that Clear. I absolutely agree with some of the things you've said, but I believe a tree is known by the fruit it produces and that's where works or deeds comes in to play. The rich young ruler in Mark 10 said he loved God, but when asked to perform a good deed his heart was shown to everyone. Many will say to Jesus, "Lord Lord I have done many good deeds in your name." But Jesus will say, "Away from Me" (Matt 7:22) That's that same Judgement we have in Revelation. But I will say with James "Faith without works is dead" (James 2:17)
 
Last edited:

SageTree

Spiritual Friend
Premium Member
I catch magog's sentiment for sure....


But over all this is a positive step, imo.

I also enjoyed the scriptural rooting for some replies here, thanks.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
What about John 8:24

Keeping in mind that I am not a Christian, and never considered myself one, it seems to me that such a verse can only be considered in a figurative manner.

But if it is somehow literal, then no worries. Makes no difference to me, but I suppose someone might care.
 
Top