Scientists should just be objective and not let their religious or political views sway them.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I have never thought that science thought that way, of course science are objective, that's what science is, its when region sticks its nose into what it doesn't even understand that makes these stupid arguments arise.Scientists should just be objective and not let their religious or political views sway them.
We're humans. The best we can do is try to be aware of our biases so as to minimize them. Pretending we can be objective contaminates our research.Scientists should just be objective
Good point.We're humans. The best we can do is try to be aware of our biases so as to minimize them. Pretending we can be objective contaminates our research.
So you're bald and engage in debates about hairdos.My position on god is that I lack a belief in him. Yes that is my position. If we are debating blond and not-blond I am not-blond. If you wanted my actual beliefs then we can discuss those but that isn't what I am debating when we debate god.
I don't have to propose being bald to argue that Mohawks are unprofessional.So you're bald and engage in debates about hairdos.
Really? So you don't believe that the lack of sufficient evidence provides a basis for not accepting the existence of god?My position on god is that I lack a belief in him. Yes that is my position. If we are debating blond and not-blond I am not-blond. If you wanted my actual beliefs then we can discuss those but that isn't what I am debating when we debate god.
So you're a professional hairdresser with some authority when it comes to what is considered a "professional" hairdo or not?I don't have to propose being bald to argue that Mohawks are unprofessional.
It is the basis. It is the basis for "not accepting" god. It is not the basis for a belief that god does not exist. Yes thank you.Really? So you don't believe that the lack of sufficient evidence provides a basis for not accepting the existence of god?
I do not follow how this is relevant.So you're a professional hairdresser with some authority when it comes to what is considered a "professional" hairdo or not?
Sigh, I did not say it was the basis for a belief that god did not exist. I articulated very clearly a position of belief regarding whether god exists. A position you hold. Yet somehow you lack belief. Seems contradictory.It is the basis. It is the basis for "not accepting" god. It is not the basis for a belief that god does not exist. Yes thank you.
It's an analogy.I do not follow how this is relevant.
You articulated that I do not accept the concept of god. That is accurate.Sigh, I did not say it was the basis for a belief that god did not exist. I articulated very clearly a position of belief regarding whether god exists. A position you hold. Yet somehow you lack belief. Seems contradictory.
Can you explain it? I am missing it somehow.It's an analogy.
You believe that there is insufficient evidence to support a belief in god. You do not lack belief. This is a belief. You have it.You articulated that I do not accept the concept of god. That is accurate.
Bald people lack hairdos like atheists lack belief in God.Can you explain it? I am missing it somehow.
I believe that there is not sufficient evidence for god. Therefore I lack a belief in god.You believe that there is insufficient evidence to support a belief in god. You do not lack belief. This is a belief. You have it.
I got that. What I didn't get was the part about being a hairdresser to have an opinion on a Mohawk.Bald people lack hairdos like atheists lack belief in God.
It was in response to your comment: "I don't have to propose being bald to argue that Mohawks are unprofessional."I got that. What I didn't get was the part about being a hairdresser to have an opinion on a Mohawk.
I think that the analogy is getting stretched to far to become useful. I am saying I don't have to propose that there is no god to not have a belief in a god.It was in response to your comment: "I don't have to propose being bald to argue that Mohawks are unprofessional."
I took that as that you would argue that Mohawks are unprofessional. Well, if they're unprofessional you would have to be some kind of authority and professional in the area of hairdos. So then I just asked you if you would consider yourself a professional hairdresser or authority to being able to judge a Mohawk to be unprofessional. You don't have to answer that if you don't want to. It was just my rhetorical response to your Mohawk statement.