Master Vigil
Well-Known Member
Yeah, the after thought, or the pre thought, does not negate the fact that the act in itself was good.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Alaric said:But then how do we know that the act was good?
Altruism is 'unselfish concern for the welfare of others', so altruism depends only on the motivation. An act is still altruistic even if you screw up and do more harm than good. It's just the act itself that is 'unhelpful' or damaging.
If we know someone intends to do good, but the action results in harm, then at least we can explain or train the person to do better next time. I think it's more important that someone wants to do good than someone does good blindly.