When the older generations die out, we will rewrite history [...]
You haven't already been doing that all this time?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
When the older generations die out, we will rewrite history [...]
“…to force”Poles were persecuting Germans, ancient Prussians, to force Germany to invade?
“to force…”Same thing in Donbas. They persecuted the Russian speakers, to push for the Donbas War. To push Putin to invade.
I was just pointing out that he wanted to invade Poland and he needed a pretext...an excuse...and the Danzig corridor thing was the right pretext.
And Hitler is in Hell....because he was evil.
But now he's forgiven by you guys? All forgotten and forgiven?
I am a Christian.
And Hitler is in Hell....because he was evil.
I was just pointing out that he wanted to invade Poland and he needed a pretext...an excuse...and the Danzig corridor thing was the right pretext.
Period.
It's funny how you guys who never condemn Soros... probably don't have the so called long-term memory.
Soros used to help his adoptive parents seize Jewish property. In Hungary.
Occupied Hungary.
But now he's forgiven by you guys? All forgotten and forgiven?
May I suggest you to read "The Banality of Evil" by Arendt?
I am totally sure you haven't read that book.
The topic here is: who funded the Nazis?“…to force”
“to force…”
That’s not what you said, you said he was forced to do it by the Poles, just as Putin was forced to invade and you support Putin in his actions…
But not for invading and ethnic cleansing of Poles apparently…
The only time I ever think of George Soros is when you mention him.
Strangely enough there are thousands of immoral rich people I never think of to approve or forgive or anything else.
Hey, tying her hands doesn't go far enuf.Your hands will be tied, and the lies will ring true, for millennia
Prolly not.You are.
If I asked you a question of history, would you answer?
Enough said.Prolly not.
There's lots of propaganda.Welcome to RF.
There wasn't really an "economic miracle" in the '30s. Most of it was propaganda. In fact, salaries went down on average. But at least, after the inflation, times were at least mostly stable. The government did some deficit spending to keep unemployment low and prices stable. Germany seemed at least to be doing well economically. That climate attracted investors, some from the US, who didn't much care about European politics. But they weren't "financing" the Nazis, they were just in it for the profit.
That's what I can remember from my school days, and we had a thorough education in history/politics of the Third Reich.
It does not bode well that you cannot have a conversation about nazism without trying to make a rich jew the focal point of the conversation.It's funny how you guys who never condemn Soros...
If you think that Arendt would agree with basically anything you've written in this thread, you ought to revisit it.May I suggest you to read "The Banality of Evil" by Arendt?
We are discussing whether an elitist cabal paid Nazis to conquer Russia on their behalf.There's so much wrong (not what I have learned) that I don't even know where to begin.
The Brits at the time were not the warmongers (rare but true). One of the biggest historical mistakes was Chamberlain's appeasement politics. The war was "necessary", as Germany was so much in debt that they had to find a money source, which Hitler thought was in more territory (besides from robbing rich Jews). The polish attacks were mostly propaganda, at least Gleiwitz was a false flag operation. With that many historical inaccuracies, I don't even have to read the conspiracy theories.
I have never claimed this.If you think that Arendt would agree with basically anything you've written in this thread, you ought to revisit it.
If your conspiracy theories are based on falsehoods, they aren't worth discussing.We are discussing whether an elitist cabal paid Nazis to conquer Russia on their behalf.
Deal with this topic.
Will you plead the fifth?
If your conspiracy theories are based on falsehoods, they aren't worth discussing.
Washington DC didn't pay the Nazis.But they weren't "financing" the Nazis, they were just in it for the profit.
That's what I can remember from my school days,
Are you sure?and we had a thorough education in history/politics of the Third Reich.
The topic here is: who funded the Nazis?
I believe someone overseas, an elitist cabal of warmongers paid them to conquer Moscow on their behalf.
No... stay with me.So the peaceful Hitler had to be tricked into both invading Poland and invading the USSR by “Jewish warmongers”? What about Czechoslovakia, was Hitler forced to invade there too? What about Holland?
No. I was speaking of Nazi Germany only.Did the same people pay the USSR to invade Poland too? Was it a different cabal of Western capitalists who helped industrialise the USSR?
This is history. I bet anti-intellectualism and allergy to history books leads people to deny history
The anti-intellectualism is based upon binary thinking: either all black or all white.It is anti-intellectualism to make up bigoted fantasies to deny history and real suffering so you can feel better about your present day political biases.
The anti-intellectualism is based upon binary thinking: either all black or all white.