Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
A church in the city of Vestavia Hills, Alabama, has launched a bid to establish its own private police force. While some lawmakers believe this will start a slippery slope; and that churches which are already exempt from taxation should not be allowed to interfere any further in governance. Still, others (Republicans, unsurprisingly) are willing to consider it.
In my opinion this sounds like yet another step in violation of the First Amendment. Religious police?
Maybe I misunderstand your meaning. They will be hired by the church, not by secular means. That is in the bill. (Thank you for posting a link.)I am not a fan of police in high school for reasons other than emergencies or soft touch. But, it strikes me that to say private institutions a,b, and c can do this and d cannot because do is religious is a little bit down the road of unequal protection. Ultimately, the police power is a state power. If the state recognizes the need for institution x to have and fund a police force (or officer) then as long as that police officer is held to the same standards and hired by secular means then I don't know on what grounds I should complain. Is this a potential can of worms? Yes. Is there room for abuse? Yes. Should we proceed cautiously in these situations? Yes. But in reality, we give our stamp of approval for a super religious university to have a police force, why not a church if the people of the community and state feel the need?
I would feel the same if a corporation complex did this as well. If the question is whether or not there is a better way to achieve the same goals, I imagine the answer is yes. But isn't that true of university police as well?
If the church's corporate land is a parcel of a larger corporation's corporate land (e.g. a municipality), it would stand that the church's private laws must comply with the private laws of its larger corporate parent's. Anyone who steps onto their private land and enters into their jurisdiction must obey their private laws.I don't see a date on the article, but I seem to remember seeing/reading/hearing about this quite a while back.
No corporate body has police; they have security units, some of them larger and better equipped and trained that the local police. Hell, the security in some gated communities puts government law enforcement to shame in those regards. They can detain people, conduct investigations, patrol the premises, etc.
Now then, what happens if there is a conflict, a disagreement, between the church's "police" and the local police or state police?
Will they be authorized to use deadly force? Will they have the power to detain people who are not on the church's campus? Who is handling the prosecution of those arrested by the church police?
I see lots of unanswered questions, and potential problems, with a real private "police" force.
They would enforce their own corporate ("church") rules/laws. The jurisdiction of the church's police force would end at the boundary of their property.And that's what worries me. A parallel law enforcement body implies enforcement of a parallel legal system. What laws would they be enforcing? Can they do it adequately or professionally? Where does the jurisdiction of this body begin or end? How long will it be before they start arresting people who aren't members of the congregation; or are but commit their 'crimes' outside of church property?
I'm curious what sort of crimes this congregation is experiencing that convinces them they need police powers to deal with the crimes?
What bounces off my brain is why would they not simply petition the local government to provide more police patrols in their area? What I'm thinking is setting up a police force is a fairly expensive undertaking. It sounds like a parish with way too much money on its hands and no creative intelligence on how to spend it effectively.I imagine one of their congregation has been coveting their neighbours ox or making graven images. Behaviour like that is best nipped in the bud otherwise the whole community might be in for a jolly good smiting.
Common sense policy imo.
What bounces off my brain is why would they not simply petition the local government to provide more police patrols in their area? What I'm thinking is setting up a police force is a fairly expensive undertaking. It sounds like a parish with way too much money on its hands and no creative intelligence on how to spend it effectively.
Could be....provided that their private laws comport with governmental ones.If the church's corporate land is a parcel of a larger corporation's corporate land (e.g. a municipality), it would stand that the church's private laws must comply with the private laws of its larger corporate parent's. Anyone who steps onto their private land and enters into their jurisdiction must obey their private laws.
A church in the city of Vestavia Hills, Alabama, has launched a bid to establish its own private police force. ................ ....................................
In my opinion this sounds like yet another step in violation of the First Amendment. Religious police?
Your thoughts?
Oh, and here's a link to the story.