An Atheist's Objections To Christianity/Theism-Scientific, Historical, Logical, Moral

[coldrock]

atheism is not so much a faith but more of an objection against something. Like enviromental activists are against wood chopper dudes, atheists are against the belief in god. But some atheists are not so anti-religious as i am but they have a disbelief in a god like someone would be against abortions but doesnt say anything.

 

[Dr._buzz]

It's a very weak argument you post when the evidence for God is only found in revelation and an Atheist's evidence is largely backed by science. We have no need to make a leap to faith when the compeling reasons are right in front of us. The is no (and no need of) faith in Atheism.

thank you now let me elaborate.

christians believe in god
buddhists believe in buddah
tycoons believe in money

atheists make decisions based on fact and evidence. stuff that proves a point. thats why they analyze the bible, historical documents, etc. and it just just me up the wall when we here christians say at or deabtes that if you have faith god will deliver you. like i said before. when your in danger who do u call?

THE COPS!

Not God!

Cause god don't have a swat car and a first aid kit...

 

[coldrock]

but a typcoon isnt a religion

 

[Mister Emu]

Like enviromental activists are against wood chopper dudes, atheists are against the belief in god.

I have never heard it put quite that way. I am also sure that all the atheists like you speaking for them...

when your in danger who do u call?

THE COPS!

Not God!

Cause god don't have a swat car and a first aid kit...

Actually I would call the cops, and pray. Why not do both?

Atheist's evidence is largely backed by science

God is only found in revelation

I have my faith, I also believe that science backs me up on certain points.

 

[Pah]

atheists are against the belief in god.

This one isn't! Nor against Christian faith. By denying Christians a belief or faith, you diminish their humanity. That should be a no-no for any atheist, in my mind.

There is a tremendous difference in not accepting the evidence for God (and maybe having contrary evidence) and denying the evidence that Christians or or ANY others accept. Evidence is only evidence - not a truth. It is the judgement of evidence that makes a truth

 

[greatcalgarian]

I have never heard it put quite that way. I am also sure that all the atheists like you speaking for them...

Actually I would call the cops, and pray. Why not do both?

I have my faith, I also believe that science backs me up on certain points.

AHHHH, I see. So pray to Alah, pray to Jesus, pray to Bhuddah, pray to Confusian, pray to Mitra, pray to your ancestors, pray to your prime minister or president, (did I miss out any one?) to have all ground covered.

 

[Dr._buzz]

ever heard of pascal's wager?
"if you believ in god and follow the bible and in the end it was false you have lost nothing, but if it is true then you shall be rewarded, therefore it is foolish to be an atheist"

therefore for this statement to properly take effect you would ave to do as calgarin said
"pray to Alah, pray to Jesus, pray to Bhuddah, pray to Confusian, pray to Mitra, pray to your ancestors, pray to your prime minister or president"

but tis is impossible because each religion/ faith has a different outlook on life, how it should be lived and what will happen in the afterlife, so you'll just turn out to be a giant ypocrite in the end if you believe in all these.

then what if none of them are real and when you die you dont go to heaven,etc. (srry i dont know any other beliefs versions of heaven) then you would have wasted your life and you cant tell anyone 'cause your dead. this is what i determine as the perfect scam.

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

ever heard of pascal's wager?

It is horribly flawed.