No sir, that is my point. No evidence is presented. Unsupported opinion is presented as fact.That, however, is a counter-intuitive and counter-evidenced claim. In that respect it is anything but logical or equivalent to its opposite claim.
Are you truly expecting people to claim complete ignorance of moral patterns as they relate to beliefs? That is quite a lot to ask for!
Since I am blind to this self-evident proof that life has provided you in abundance, then please enlighten me with your documentation supporting the claim that atheists (who do not believe) are more moral, than those who believe.
Even then, you are only half way there, since the claim is MOST MORAL.
Who are these "worlds most moral" non-believers that are so widely known that the claim requires no support?
How does one actually measure "morality" to quantify who is 'most moral'?
Apparently, I am the only one who can't see it.