Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well, for me, I certainly didn't crash into this rock on purpose. Earth just cut me off, no signal, nothin! Just veered into my lane and here I am, waiting for AAA to tow me to a shop. I dunno what I am paying them for, been stuck here for a solid 220 years. They will not be getting a good yelp review, I tell ya that!
I often wondered whether the ideas of orifice intrusion(s) was more a result of a real experience or an indication of child sexual abuse, the mind is a funny thing and the recovered memories theory seems a largely debunked idea.I thought they tended to be anal?
Its one of those subjects I try to leave alone as it is potentially a bit spooky, but I think:
1) yes. There probably is extra-terrestrial life.
2) At a guess, no. They don't visit us. Perhaps some are real but I think its our interplentary ego at work.
Purely on a hunch I think the video is a fake. It is well done however so maybe from a movie? The sort of questions being asked are not very specific and it doesnt strike me as the kind of interrogation that it is real. The intelligence agencies would only start asking about the meaning of life and how the universe once theyve established the alien is not a security threat.... Which is a massive subject in terms of understanding an alien civilisations capabilities in terms of weapons, faster than light speed travel, etc.
The name EBE-3 appears to relate to the mythology around the Roswell incident. the alien also speaks English without apparent difficulty and appears to have "new age beliefs".
(Is this promotional material from the new alien invasion movie "arrival"? I cant load Youtube atm so I'm not sure. Its not beyond the film industry to exploit our fascination with these questions to get us to watch their stuff).
But yeah. I am second guessing myself here. This is well done assuming its fake.
Given that the interview is supposedly 1964, the video and audio is actually quite good--too good, in fact, for that time. The quality is not consistent with videotape, nor is it similar to the 16 mm that would likely have been used at the time, and I don't think the lighting scenario would be typical of the Defense Department of the day.
Worse, Earth has been obstructing my view of Venus for millennia!
Yes, even better than the Dalai Lama.