An Ontological Proof that God Does Not Exist

[Tiberius]

Sounds logical except nearly 100% of people who've ever lived have felt the touch of God, nearly no one except atheists in forums have "felt" the pink unicorn.

Again you go with the argument from popularity.

I mean--let's go beyond the theoretical--YOU have had this conversation with many people, "God doesn't exist!" ... "No matter what you say, I feel God, I talk to God, God talks to me, I KNOW God is true and real and love."

You've NEVER had that conversation about pink unicorns with any person. All I'm asking for is a bit more realness and honesty than I'm feeling from you in this discussion.

Thanks.

Feeling something is not the measure by which something is determined to be real.

There are things which people have felt and they have not been real, and there are real things which are not felt at all.

 

[questfortruth]

Premise 3: To accomplish something while suffering a handicap is greater than accomplishing that thing with no handicap.

To save us from Proof of Death, one needs to reject this Premise 3.
It is officially wrong. Now holds true: only healthy working person can be perfect.

 

[rational experiences]

Humans. Self present. Living.

No science. Exact natural life first of humanity. Natural history.

The agreement of men. Scientific terminology only and human expressed.

Original man adult father taught the words about each one single object seen by a human.

Baby man defied his human father and instead used scientific terms. Which equated secondary false terms after he acknowledged his baby life changed...no man is God or a God.

Gods term by father stated O planet mass earth that created it's heavens mass.

Both mass bodies. God was mass said our fathers holy One first worded teachings. Human natural father.

Coercion. Human men tried to convince humanity cosmic energy like an atom owned a humans biological aware consciousness before him. To claim why he knew destruction reaction.

Reassessing his belief to thesis was only due to brain mind defected by star fall...fall out. Cooling gave him new advices he never had thought upon before.

Father human correct. Trust your life exists after the garden had existed. After animals existed. A human only teaching. Natural place.

Don't trust your human brother a theist satanist scientist.

A real human only teaching....no man is God. A human man never owned a thesis why human life existed..nor why anything else existed.

As it was ALL existing.

As he breathed breath AH....oxygenation of his mind brain is how he existed. Teaching him that his type of consciousness biological could not exist before it did.

ALL AH. The term for accept your first mutual equal term as first and only. No deviations as God was one said by all men who honoured humans holy life.

Not any other type of brothers teaching. As men as brothers just humans had agreed upon science terms just as humans.

Was exact. Only one God in mass. Two types mass of the O body being a planet. And the spirit heavens being gases.

A gas spirit already owned the non physical body of the planet mass by being a gas. What a planet mass isn't is extra space to be a gas.

Hence thesis is not real it's only human coercive. By themes and stories only put together by a human telling a story first.

A man with a machine is the only real practice of science. It destroys anything a man chooses to forcibly change. Is his exact behaviour relating to a machine. To change natural.

Medical is self aware humans advice.

The teaching. How it was once read and taught. Is not how it's read and taught today. Legal terms.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Could you demonstrate it then?

This discussion is absolutely hilarious.
It's funny how you are beating apologists at their own game while it's taken seriously.
So hilarious.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Are you saying this is a serious argument you had made?

No.

He's saying he simply applied the logic from the ontological argument for god to another argument against god.

If the logic of an argument is sound, it should equally apply to other situations using the same logic.
But in your previous post you spotted the fallacy you say. Good for you.

Somehow I have a feeling you won't recognize the very same fallacy when the very same argument is presented as an argument FOR god.

 

[rational experiences]

If humans say other humans are wrong. Then it owns a basis.

Today biologists state a human first who does not exist in the body of an ape. And study says as human biology owns it's status they are stating a Higher form than. The ape. Living.

To humans god is the greatest. Hence a human says I'm the greatest. I'm the highest....a Human.

Not God.

So a human said God is the highest and greatest. A human said it. I am with God as the greatest highest.

I am with the rock. I own my own living proof a skeletal body.

Against theists. Who theory using spirit imagery first and only.

So humans who establish human rights and self hierarchy did so. Making it legal. Humans legal position in natural law. On gods body with God the human.

The old human argument. I'm living after the garden nature body as millions of types. And after animals. Millions of types. My place human. My life human.

Is the exact said argument that said trust your life with God is exact in the position human. Is the same human biologist by use science an actual machine supported the status biology. Exact.

Versus men with machines who do reactions just for machines. Yet include life's biology in the thesis. About machines only for machines. Named as Satanism.

 

[Tiberius]

To save us from Proof of Death, one needs to reject this Premise 3.
It is officially wrong. Now holds true: only healthy working person can be perfect.

Officially wrong. That's cute.