Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This guy could probably learn something from Jesus: "Therefore I speak to them in parables; because while seeing they do not see, and while hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand." Matthew 13:13A FAMOUS TAOIST SAYING:
"Those who know don't say, and those who say don't know."
[FONT=Times, Times New Roman][SIZE=+3]I[/SIZE][/FONT]n the sixth century B.C. Lao-tzu, the purported founder of Taoism, said (and wrote) many things about Taoism. And certainly this very famous Taoist saying has now been said. Are we therefore to understand that no one who has ever spoken for Taoism in the past (including Lao-Tzu himself), or who would ever speak for Taoism in the future, actually knows anything about Taoism or 'Taoist truth'?
"The cosmic Tao is invisible, inaudible, unnameable, undiscussible, inexpressible" [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, Swiss, Geneva, Sans Serif][SIZE=-1](Max Mueller, Sacred Books of the East, London: Krishna Press)[/SIZE].
"For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts." Isaiah 55:9If the Tao is truly inexpressible, how is it that these attributes of the Tao are then being expressed?
"Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that he has, and do not spare him; but put to death both man and woman, child and infant, ox and shepp, camel and donkey." 1 Samuel 15:3These adjectives could just as easily describe my cat as he sits and stares at nothing on one of our long Maine winter evenings. His nickname could be Wu Wei (Tao for inaction). This is really a description of mindlessness. But the Christian Bible advises me to love the Lord with all my mind--in spirit and in truth.
"Tao is the essence or substance of the universe and could be viewed as 'God'" [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, Swiss, Geneva, Sans Serif][SIZE=-1](Barry Pierce, via the Internet, in A Synthesis of Taoist Philosophy)[/SIZE].
Well no duh, they're different religions.The God of the Bible is monotheistic, separated from the universe, and personal. You are describing a monistic 'God' who is all. The two are not the same.
And as I just quoted, the Bible advances, among other things, the idea that it's acceptable to destroy whole cities, down to the most innocent infant. Rulers have considered such advice to constitute a workable plan or a viable option, but generally it doesn't work out for their life or reputation in the long run.THE TAO TE KING (Tao scripture) is a book of about 5,500 words. Among other things, it advances the idea that government rulers should lead by non-action. No ruler anywhere in the world has ever considered such advice to constitute a workable plan or a viable option.
If Lao-Tzu's advice has proven so ludicrous and unworkable in one area, how is he credible in others?
"Once I, Chuang Chou, dreamed that I was a butterfly. Suddenly I awoke, and there I was, visibly Chou. I do not know whether it was Chou dreaming that he was a butterfly or the butterfly dreaming it was Chou" [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, Swiss, Geneva, Sans Serif][SIZE=-1](Chuang-Tzu, disciple of Lao-Tzu, 4th century B.C.)[/SIZE].
"I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago--whether in the body I do not know, or out of the body I do not know, God knows--such a man was caught up to the third heaven. And I know how such a man--whether in the body or apart from the body I do not know, God knows--was caught up into Paradise, and heard inexpressible words, which a man is not permitted to speak." 2 Corinthians 12:2-4Since no butterfly is ever known to have questioned whether or not he was a butterfly, much less recorded such a predicament, it is probably safe to assume that you are Chou and not the butterfly.
Has it ever occurred to you that Christianity itself may be a yin of misguided thinking, in need to deliverance from the yang of reason?YIN-YANG, the Tao concept of many elements that are contrary to one another, i.e. male/female, positive/negative, light/darkness, active/passive, and life/death. Yin is represented by the darker shape and broken lines. Yang is represented by the lighter shape and solid lines.
Has it ever occurred to you that Taoism itself may be a yin of misguided thinking, in need of deliverance from the 'yang' of truth?
Could it be that the Tao is the answer for Christians?Could it be that Jesus is the answer for Taoists?
"There was something undefined and complete, coming into existence before Heaven and Earth. It may be regarded as the Mother of all things. I do not know its name..." [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, Swiss, Geneva, Sans Serif][SIZE=-1](The Tao Te King, chapter XXV)[/SIZE].
This, of course, rests on the assumption that all Taoists actually worship "the Mother of all things," which many of them don't. But nice try. [/FONT]
The Apostle Paul, at the original Areopagus in ancient Greece spoke with great authority:
"What therefore you worship in ignorance, this I proclaim to you...the God who made the world and all things in it...He is Lord of heaven and earth..." [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, Swiss, Geneva, Sans Serif][SIZE=-1](Acts 17:23-24)[/SIZE].[/FONT]
"Tao" for inaction? :biglaugh: I wonder if the author of this realizes just how silly it sounds to call the Chinese language "way".[FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica, Swiss, Sans Serif]His nickname could be Wu Wei (Tao for inaction).[/FONT]
They'd better tell that to the Chinese emperors that had advisors who extensively studied Taoist ideas and philosophies.[FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica, Swiss, Sans Serif]Among other things, it advances the idea that government rulers should lead by non-action. No ruler anywhere in the world has ever considered such advice to constitute a workable plan or a viable option.[/FONT]
I used to think this too... my mind has changed. Tao has as much to do with inaction or action, as it does with understanding and awareness.Guitar's Cry said:The argument that following the Tao equals inaction (as defined by doing nothing, like the author's cat) is one of the most common misinterpretations of Taoism.
It's not about doing nothing, it's about doing everything according to the Tao - following the course of the river, not fighting against it.
Regarding doing nothing someone said something to me the other day that struck me as rather interesting: -ChrisP said:I used to think this too... my mind has changed. Tao has as much to do with inaction or action, as it does with understanding and awareness.
In fact tao has everything to do with nothing, and vice versa.
This sounds fricking mystical but it's not. Trust me. I'm just not the sort for that sorta stuff
Scarlett Wampus said:Regarding doing nothing someone said something to me the other day that struck me as rather interesting: -
"If you want to get a glimpse of why holding specific beliefs is not important to Taoism spend 3 days without speaking, listening, reading, writing or trying to think about those things. Go without music and moving images too. I guarantee you'll understand things a little differently afterwards."
Yeah I thought so. Although I'm meant to be ultra-busy I think I'm gonna spare 3 days between Christmas and New Year for this. Its been a while since I've done anything like that.GeneCosta said:That's actually an interesting thought. I might try it when I don't have classes.
Exactly how it was reccomend to this sheep.Scarlett Wampus said:In fact I think it would be a good thing to recommend to anyone who is interested in meditation but is getting upset by their lack of concentration.
He doesn't think about his actions;
they flow from the core of his being.