Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I believe that the writings referred to are of Egyptian in origin both on metalic plates and papyri.doppelgänger;1152144 said:None of the writings are specifically identified, but parts of the description make it sound like comparisons are being drawn to the Nag Hammadi documents (the "Gnostic" Gospels). Are those the "Egyptian" documents to which he is referring in the article?
Agreed. IMO Lehi probably was a trader. It is obvious that he knew the art of the carivan. Also the fact that they had so much gold and silver items. Those were common commodities to trade in the Sixth Century BC for goods and services. So I am sure that Lehi had travelled outside Jerusalem around the known trading area of Israel at that time. It would have been important for his sons to know Egyptian along with other languages of the geographical area.if he is a descendant of Joseph it would explain why Lehi knew Reformed Egytptian.
Agreed. IMO Lehi probably was a trader. It is obvious that he knew the art of the carivan. Also the fact that they had so much gold and silver items. Those were common commodities to trade in the Sixth Century BC for goods and services. So I am sure that Lehi had travelled outside Jerusalem around the known trading area of Israel at that time. It would have been important for his sons to know Egyptian along with other languages of the geographical area.
That doesn't help at all. What documents is he talking about?I believe that the writings referred to are of Egyptian in origin both on metalic plates and papyri.
Documents recently discovered in Egypt.doppelgänger;1153331 said:That doesn't help at all. What documents is he talking about?
With the evidence mounting the link between the truthfulness of the BOM and pre Columbian culture continues to narrow. But you know scholars with a PhD many times are the most dumb people I have ever metVery cool article! What gets me is why these scholars don't accept that Mormonism is true when they see the evidence like they are seeing. It just makes no sense.
Griggs doesn't say. The article doesn't say. Just ... documents.doppelgänger;1153331 said:That doesn't help at all. What documents is he talking about?
It is my understanding that there is no such language as "reformed egyptian" found anywhere other than being mentioned by Joseph Smith. QUOTE]
Reformed Egyptian did not exist in Egypt. It came about in New World:
"And now, behold, we have written this record according to our knowledge, IN THE CHARACTERS WHICH ARE CALLED AMONG US THE REFORMED EGYPTIAN, BEING HANDED DOWN AND ALTERED BY US, ACCORDING TO OUR MANNER OF SPEECH.
And if our plates had been sufficiently large, we should have written in Hebrew; but the Hebrew hath been altered by us also; and if we could have written in Hebrew, behold, ye would have had no imperfection in our record.
But the Lord knoweth the things which we have written, and also that NONE OTHER PEOPLE KNOWETH OUR LANGUAGE; and because that none other people knoweth our language, therefore he hath prepared means for the interpretation thereof. (Mormon 9:32-34)
When the family of Lehi first arrived they recorded their history in the language with which they were familiar namely Nephi said: "in the language of my father, which consists of the learning of the Jews and the language of the Egyptians. (1Nephi 1:2)
King Benjamin also stated:
"For it were not possible that our father, Lehi, could have remembered all these things, to have taught them to his children, except it were for the help of these plates; for he having taught in the language of the Egyptians therefore he could read these engravings, and teach them to his children, that therebt they could teach them to their children, and so fulfilling the commandments of God, even down to thepresent time. (Mosiah 1:4 (3)
While originally, one of the original written languages of Lehi's group was a form of Egyptian such as demotic, which began to be used 50 yrs before Lehi left Jerusalem, that language evolved, which may have been possibly due in part to contact with other cultures, into a language that became a modified or reformed Egyptian.
Not all of those texts are ancient, and the bell doesn't designate newly found texts, but texts that are "new" to site -- although some of them have been there nearly four years.Here is an interesting site with a large collection of ancient writings link newly found texts are highlighted with a bell.