• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ancient Orgasms: Where's the Fossil Evidence?

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
So, Evolutionists, if the (just a theory! ---->) Theory (<---- just a theory!) of Evolution is correct, then how come we have no transitional fossils marking the evolution of orgasms from singular to multiple? Huh? How come? Answer me that!!!!!!

Checkmate, fools!
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
The first orgasm happened right after the Big Bang. Then the universe and all creatures came (into existence, that is).
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
So, Evolutionists, if the (just a theory! ---->) Theory (<---- just a theory!) of Evolution is correct, then how come we have no transitional fossils marking the evolution of orgasms from singular to multiple? Huh? How come? Answer me that!!!!!!

Checkmate, fools!

Multiple orgarms?
Oh come on, that's just a tall tale that others tell us to make us jealous.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
BBC News - Turtles fossilised in sex embrace
Looking at the expression on the male's face (the female is obviously faking it), here's your evidence....
_61009517_turtle1.jpg
 

Amechania

Daimona of the Helpless
All female mammals have a clitoris, so its presumable that they are capable of orgasm. Soft tissue doesn't fossilize often so it's hard to know if females of an early mammalian species also possessed a clitoris, but it's likely since sexual pleasure is an obvious aid to reproduction. Female simians and even bovines have been stimulated to orgasm under laboratory conditions but whether it regularly occurs in nature is harder to determine due to the brevity of sexual encounters in the wild. Other vertebrates, even those that make use of penetration, lack a clitoris. I can't imagine those females experience orgasm but that doesn't mean sex isn't pleasurable for them on some level. Humans are extremely sexual creatures, with females in estrus year-round and with males possessing uneccessarily large penises, not to mention all the secondary sexual characteristics that dominate our physiques. I would assume from that that our early ancestors not only experienced orgasm but that it evolved into an ability to have multiple orgasms apace with the developement of our other sexual characteristics. This may have facilitated multiple couplings, a strategy that could contribute to an increased liklihood of pregnancy.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
All female mammals have a clitoris, so its presumable that they are capable of orgasm. Soft tissue doesn't fossilize often so it's hard to know if females of an early mammalian species also possessed a clitoris, but it's likely since sexual pleasure is an obvious aid to reproduction. Female simians and even bovines have been stimulated to orgasm under laboratory conditions but whether it regularly occurs in nature is harder to determine due to the brevity of sexual encounters in the wild. Other vertebrates, even those that make use of penetration, lack a clitoris. I can't imagine those females experience orgasm but that doesn't mean sex isn't pleasurable for them on some level. Humans are extremely sexual creatures, with females in estrus year-round and with males possessing uneccessarily large penises, not to mention all the secondary sexual characteristics that dominate our physiques. I would assume from that that our early ancestors not only experienced orgasm but that it evolved into an ability to have multiple orgasms apace with the developement of our other sexual characteristics. This may have facilitated multiple couplings, a strategy that could contribute to an increased liklihood of pregnancy.

Just more agenda-driven Evolutionist "science". :ignore:
 
Top