• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Anglican Plan Threatens Split on Gay Issues

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
You use the words "rather than to define ourselves so harshly that some are left out." And yet my gay Episcopalian friends feel left out in churches in which they are not allowed access to all of the sacraments, as straight people are, such as holy orders or marriage. I don't see this as a gray issue at all.

What if we were debating the ordination and consecration of African Americans as clergy and bishops? Would we seek some middle ground, some compromise, some ban on African American Episcopalians to the sacraments of holy orders and marriage? Would that truly be Christ like?

Christ's message, at least as I understand it, was a radical one. It got him crucified, after all.

I can see where compromise has been necessary and even good for the Anglican Communion as well as other religious communities. But some issues are moral issues, and on that, I can't see compromise as an option. I don't think it would be moral to exclude people from any sacraments based on race, nor on gender, nor on sexuality.

I'm sure all here would agree that it would be unacceptable to ban the consecration of African American bishops if the rest of the Anglican Communion had a problem with it. But for some reason, a different reasoning is applied to LGBT people, and on no solid theological grounds at that.
In addition to some other considerations, religion is part of and reflective of the culture in which it finds expression. Culture is constantly shifting. It's a process. Compromise here, I believe, may be found in a process of moving toward full inclusion, giving the more conservative ones an opportunity to acclimate to the idea of homosexuality being OK. Homosexuality is not yet fully OK in our culture, so it's unrealistic for a body that values tolerance to expect it to be that way in the Church.

While I wish it were different, and that all people could participate fully, I think patience and perseverance are the watch words here.
 
Top