You're being unfair to clowns.What else do you expect from that list of clowns?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You're being unfair to clowns.What else do you expect from that list of clowns?
I trust that was a joke?The racism of the left is evident very clearly in this matter and I'll explain why. It's one thing for them to speak of white men being untrustworthy in the context of judging or questioning a minority. But now according to the left; white men can't even be trusted to judge their own race. In other words white men are inherently evil in all cases and can't be trusted at all, ever.
The idea that a group of people would not be defined by their behavior is certainly intriguing.Political parties are what they do.
You can't define them by any particular behavioral traits.
Those just emerge at times.
A panel of 12 or whatever should approximately reflect the population as a whole.
Therefore you'd expect something like 5 (or maybe 7) women and maybe 3 Afro-Americans, a Latino...you get the idea.
It isn't racism to point out that all white men doesn't match that profile.
Apparently it's God's will that Americastan become a one party country.
Oh, boy....we'll be like China.
Not necessary; as in normal groups they happen automatically.Should their be quota laws for democratically elected officials?
LOLI am loving the fact that the Grand Old Party is crumbling. Conservatives are crumbling. If God wills, I’ll live long enough to see 2040 and the tears that will flow.
I didn't say that, now did I?So only white males, of Western European descent cheat and lie their way to extremely high office?
But in talking about the particular group grilling Dr. Ford, they are none of those things.Can you imagine the righteous outrage if "white" were replaced with "black"?
Or if "men" were replaced with "women"?
They're not calling for diversity & broader representation....instead they attack
based upon age, race & gender.
Um, not really. Statistically speaking, expecting minorities to be elected in rates proportional to their size of the population makes no sense.I trust that was a joke?
A panel of 12 or whatever should approximately reflect the population as a whole.
Therefore you'd expect something like 5 (or maybe 7) women and maybe 3 Afro-Americans, a Latino...you get the idea.
It isn't racism to point out that all white men doesn't match that profile.
What else do you expect from that list of clowns?
The idea that a group of people would not be defined by their behavior is certainly intriguing.
I am loving the fact that the Grand Old Party is crumbling. Conservatives are crumbling. If God wills, I’ll live long enough to see 2040 and the tears that will flow.
Hello. It seems to me that most traditional conservatives have left the GOP. What is left is not the party of, for example, Regan or Nixon.
When you say “the left” are you referring to the pundits quoted in the OP? Is that what you think the left is?But yes, there is indeed much bigotry coming from the left
I read the article. Author's bias against Hispanic, black, and Indians shines through. She clips the statements of journalists out of context. And she has no surprise that 11 men will question a female. An awful biased motivated writer, imo.
...
That's not what I said.The idea that a group of people would not be defined by their behavior is certainly intriguing.
I didn't verify that everyone of the quoted ones is leftish.When you say “the left” are you referring to the pundits quoted in the OP? Is that what you think the left is?