• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Announcement of Presidential Candidacy

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Thank you for coming.

I have called this press conference to announce that I am a candidate for the Presidency of America and to ask for the support of all humans who share my belief that the American nation needs to embark on a new, constructive course. I believe my candidacy will be healthy for the nation and lead to a party.

I am running because I have grown increasingly concerned about the course of events in both the United States and in the normal world.

In just a few years, three vital measures of economic decay—idiot politicians, social media posts , and Tucker Carlson's ego —have more than doubled, at times reaching 10 percent growth annually and even more.

Government at all levels now absorbs more than 44 percent of our personal income. It has become more intrusive, more coercive, more meddlesome and less effective, even compared to the crapfest it was during Reagan's time. Our access to cheap and abundant energy has been interrupted by misguided attempts to save a doomed planet at the cost of being able to drive large SUVs, and our dependence on foreign sauces is growing, with hummus being particularly concerning. A decade ago we had military superiority. Today we are in danger of being surpassed by a nation that has never made an effort to hide its hostility to everything we stand for. We ignore Canada at our own risk.

Through détente we have sought peace with our adversaries. We should continue to do so but must make it plain that we expect a stronger indication that they also seek a lasting peace with us.

In my opinion, the root of these problems lies right here—in Washington, D.C. The nation’s capital has become the seat of a “buddy” system that functions for its own benefit—increasingly insensitive to the needs of the American worker who supports it with his taxes. Or her taxes. Or their taxes.

Today it is difficult to find leaders who are independent of the forces that have brought us our problems—the Congress, the bureaucracy, the lobbyist, big business and big labor. However, I represent that independence, mostly since I haven't visited America in almost 40 years, and aren't even legally entitled to run.

If America is to survive and go forward, the current circumstance must change. It will only change when the American people vote for a leadership that better pretends to listen to them, relies on them to ignore laws to elect them and seeks to return government to foreign interests, just like in King George III's time. We need a government that is confident not of what it can do, but of what the people can be persuaded to do despite their own best interests.

In the coming months I will take this message to the American people. I will talk in detail about responsible, responsive government. I will tell the people it is they who should decide how much government they want, and whether that government needs to be legally legitimate or not.

I don’t believe for one moment that four more years of business-as-usual in Washington is the answer to our problems, and I don’t think the American people believe it either.

We, as a people, aren’t happy if we are not moving forward. A nation that is growing and thriving is one which will solve its problems. We must offer progress instead of stagnation; the truth instead of promises; hope and faith instead of defeatism and despair. Then, I am sure, the people will make those decisions which will restore confidence in our way of life and release that energy that is the American spirit.

And by 'American spirit', I don't mean bourbon. At least, not entirely.

Thank-you for your attention.
I'll now take questions.

(Much of this speech has been blatantly plagiarised from Reagan's candidacy announcement in 1975. Made a couple of minor tweaks...)
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Thank-you for your attention.
I'll now take questions.

(Much of this speech has been blatantly plagiarised from Reagan's candidacy announcement in 1975. Made a couple of minor tweaks...)

I vaguely remember when Reagan unsuccessfully ran for the Republican nomination in 1976, when Ford lost to Carter. It's probably good for Reagan that he didn't get the nomination, since he probably would have lost to Carter, too. But by 1980, public opinion was turning against Carter. During Carter's term, the Democrats had 60% of the Senate and House and the White House, yet they still ended in failure and handed the country over to Reagan and his ilk, which set the course for America which led us to where we are now.

As for my question, if nominated, who would you select as your running mate?
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
I vaguely remember when Reagan unsuccessfully ran for the Republican nomination in 1976, when Ford lost to Carter. It's probably good for Reagan that he didn't get the nomination, since he probably would have lost to Carter, too. But by 1980, public opinion was turning against Carter. During Carter's term, the Democrats had 60% of the Senate and House and the White House, yet they still ended in failure and handed the country over to Reagan and his ilk, which set the course for America which led us to where we are now.

As for my question, if nominated, who would you select as your running mate?
Good question. I can go old school, and pick someone whose politics are close enough to line but won't stab me in the back.
Or I can go modern, and try to cover as many subgroups as possible that I don't cover.

In which case I'd need a millennial non-binary or female type person, with credibility, and the ability to form coherent sentences, but not loose cannon enough to get my party in hot water. Someone actually IN the country I'm trying to get power over might be handy too.

*ponders*

@VoidCat ?
 

mangalavara

नमस्कार
Premium Member
and our dependence on foreign sauces is growing, with hummus being particularly concerning.

As someone who enjoys hummus, you lost me.

I haven't visited America in almost 40 years, and aren't even legally entitled to run.

That doesn’t explain why 19% of the American voting population intends to vote for you according to The Week.
 

VoidCat

Use any and all pronouns including neo and it/it's
Good question. I can go old school, and pick someone whose politics are close enough to line but won't stab me in the back.
Or I can go modern, and try to cover as many subgroups as possible that I don't cover.

In which case I'd need a millennial non-binary or female type person, with credibility, and the ability to form coherent sentences, but not loose cannon enough to get my party in hot water. Someone actually IN the country I'm trying to get power over might be handy too.

*ponders*

@VoidCat ?
I'll stab you in the back...for calling me millennial im gen Z
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Heh...

My personal favourite was 'It will only change when the American people vote for a leadership that better pretends to listen to them'...
I propose reflexive voting. We will elect your officials, and you elect our officials. That should help to shake things up. Another option is to add in a few other countries forming a circle. For example we elect your officials, you elect Canada's, and then we all ignore Canada.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
I propose reflexive voting. We will elect your officials, and you elect our officials. That should help to shake things up. Another option is to add in a few other countries forming a circle. For example we elect your officials, you elect Canada's, and then we all ignore Canada.

Hard pass. You guys have elections for all sorts of crazy things. We'd be voting non-stop. However, I'm tempted to outsource our voting to Canada. What could possibly go wrong.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I do have a lot of respect and admiration for grassroots, underdog candidates. It brings back memories from when I was young and learning about the system. I remember around the '68 election, I had a "Snoopy For President" poster in my room.

1201000358-l.jpg


Alas, Snoopy didn't win the election. Some other dog won that year.

 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
What are you going to do about gun reform?

I actually think it's more an issue of gun culture than it is gun control. So my basic reform program will seek to move us away from the glorification of guns.

1. All gun owners will need to go through an education program which is applicable to the broad category of weapon they are seeking to own. This will focus on responsible use, safety, and legal responsibilities and rights. Some broad examples of the sort of programs we'd be running are;
a. Responsible use and storage of handguns, which we will get local authorities to run.
b. Effective handling and legal responsibilities of long barrel weapon ownership, which we will get local hunting clubs to run.
c. Where the heck are my WMDs?, which focuses on the safe storage of more substantial weapons, run by Colin Powell

2. In order to discourage the use of weapons as accessories, and so-called 'tacticool' fashion statements, all weapons larger than .22 calibre will be painted pink, and be kept in a fluffy holster. The sole exception to this rule is for anyone with a Barbie fetish. Their weapons will instead be painted in traditional plaid. All bullet proof armour, other kevlar products, and laser sights will have one of the following messages imprinted on them;
a. Real men drink soy
b. I need this because ducks are scary, man...
c. I feel bigger already

3. All Hollywood movies will be measured to ensure there is less gun-based action, and more alternative action. This will be colloquially known as the 'Make Love not War' rule, and will apply to all shows and all forms of gun violence. Admittedly we are working out some of the kinks with this plan. A trial run recut of the X-Men suddenly generated 'The X-Rated Men', and I really would prefer not to mention what happened to Wolverine's claws. Suffice to say, this one is under review.
 
Last edited:

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
There is no country called "America".
It's part of my cunning plan to avoid being in breach of the laws of the United States of America.
But if that's all you took from my amazing speech, I'm going to have to kindly ask you not to vote for me. We're trying to achieve something special here, and it takes a particular grand vision not troubled by trivialities like grammar, accuracy or legalities.
 

PureX

Veteran Member
It's part of my cunning plan to avoid being in breach of the laws of the United States of America.
But if that's all you took from my amazing speech, I'm going to have to kindly ask you not to vote for me. We're trying to achieve something special here, and it takes a particular grand vision not troubled by trivialities like grammar, accuracy or legalities.
As president of the Truth In Labeling Society, I couldn't vote for you, anyway.
 
Top